File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Effectiveness of Self-care Enablement Programmes Delivered in Small Groups or by Telephone to Prevent Complications of Diabetes Mellitus

TitleEffectiveness of Self-care Enablement Programmes Delivered in Small Groups or by Telephone to Prevent Complications of Diabetes Mellitus
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherNorth American Primary Care Research Group.
Citation
45th North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) Annual Meeting 2017, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 17-21 November 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractContext: Self-care is an essential part of the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). Studies have demonstrated the benefit of structured DM self-care enablement programs in trial settings but their effectiveness in real-world practice is not clear. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two DM self-care enablement programmes delivered in small groups (PEP) or by telephone (Call Centre) in real-world primary care. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Public primary care in Hong Kong. Patients: 63,846 Chinese primary care patients with type 2 DM and without any known complication managed in public primary care clinics in 2012-2013. Usual care only group: 47,802; usual care and PEP: 10,030; usual care and Call Centre: 6,014. Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Incidence of CVD was primary; incidence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality were secondary. Results: After a median 3-year follow-up, the unadjusted absolute risk reduction (ARR) in CVD, ESRD and all-cause mortality by PEP was -1.34%, -0.26% and -1.66%, respectively. The ARR in CVD, ESRD and all-cause mortality by Call Centre was -0.56%, -0.02% and -0.48%, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional regressions showed that PEP and Call Centre were associated with significant relative risk reduction (RRR) of CVD compared with usual care group by 14% (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.86; P < 0.001) and 16% (HR: 0.84; P < 0.001), respectively, after adjustment of baseline characteristics. PEP was associated with a significant RRR of 33% (HR: 0.67; P < 0.001) of all-cause mortality compared with Call Centre, but no significant difference was found in the risk of CVD and ESRD between PEP and Call Centre groups. Conclusions: DM self-care enablement programmes delivered in small groups or by telephone in real-world primary care were effective in reducing the risk of CVD, ESRD and all-cause mortality for DM patients.
DescriptionOral Presentation on Completed Research: Free Paper Session no. DB14
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/261650

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLK-
dc.contributor.authorWong, WCW-
dc.contributor.authorWan, EYF-
dc.contributor.authorWong, CKH-
dc.contributor.authorChan, AKC-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-28T04:45:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-28T04:45:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citation45th North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) Annual Meeting 2017, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 17-21 November 2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/261650-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation on Completed Research: Free Paper Session no. DB14-
dc.description.abstractContext: Self-care is an essential part of the management of diabetes mellitus (DM). Studies have demonstrated the benefit of structured DM self-care enablement programs in trial settings but their effectiveness in real-world practice is not clear. Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two DM self-care enablement programmes delivered in small groups (PEP) or by telephone (Call Centre) in real-world primary care. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Public primary care in Hong Kong. Patients: 63,846 Chinese primary care patients with type 2 DM and without any known complication managed in public primary care clinics in 2012-2013. Usual care only group: 47,802; usual care and PEP: 10,030; usual care and Call Centre: 6,014. Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Incidence of CVD was primary; incidence of end stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality were secondary. Results: After a median 3-year follow-up, the unadjusted absolute risk reduction (ARR) in CVD, ESRD and all-cause mortality by PEP was -1.34%, -0.26% and -1.66%, respectively. The ARR in CVD, ESRD and all-cause mortality by Call Centre was -0.56%, -0.02% and -0.48%, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional regressions showed that PEP and Call Centre were associated with significant relative risk reduction (RRR) of CVD compared with usual care group by 14% (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.86; P < 0.001) and 16% (HR: 0.84; P < 0.001), respectively, after adjustment of baseline characteristics. PEP was associated with a significant RRR of 33% (HR: 0.67; P < 0.001) of all-cause mortality compared with Call Centre, but no significant difference was found in the risk of CVD and ESRD between PEP and Call Centre groups. Conclusions: DM self-care enablement programmes delivered in small groups or by telephone in real-world primary care were effective in reducing the risk of CVD, ESRD and all-cause mortality for DM patients.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNorth American Primary Care Research Group.-
dc.relation.ispartofNAPCRG 2017 (North American Primary Care Research Group) Annual Meeting-
dc.titleEffectiveness of Self-care Enablement Programmes Delivered in Small Groups or by Telephone to Prevent Complications of Diabetes Mellitus-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLK: clklam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, WCW: wongwcw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWan, EYF: yfwan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailWong, CKH: carlosho@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, AKC: kcchanae@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLK=rp00350-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, WCW=rp01457-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, CKH=rp01931-
dc.identifier.hkuros292824-
dc.publisher.placeMontreal, Canada-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats