File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Peer Tutoring: Reflective Knowledge Building and Beyond

TitlePeer Tutoring: Reflective Knowledge Building and Beyond
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherClute Institute for Academic Research.
Citation
2017 International Conference on Education, New York, NY, USA, 30 July-3 August 2017. In IACB, ICE & ICTE Conference Proceedings, 2017, p. 344-1 How to Cite?
AbstractPeer tutoring schemes have long since been recognized as a valuable support system within tertiary education. While some research has focused on the metacognitive gains for peer tutors (Cho & Cho, 2011; Cho & McArthur, 2011; Nicol, Thomson & Breslin, 2011), little has been written about other benefits this type of interaction provides. This paper reports on preliminary research conducted at two Hong Kong universities where peer tutoring schemes are in place. Narrative enquiry into the peer tutors’ experience, and response to their roles showed affective and socio-emotional skills development, which were seen to be beneficial to the tutors as learners and as part of life-long and life-wide skills development. The paper will also explore how peer tutoring schemes not only sit within the literature of social constructivism (Jonassen, 1994) but also link to wider fields of study into workplace and soft skills development. REFERENCES: 1. Cho, Y.H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments. Instructional Science 39(5): 629-643 2. Cho, K., & McArthur, C.(2011). Learning by Reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology 103(1): 73-84 3. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2011). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014 Vol. 39, No. 1, 102-122 DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.7955.18 4. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational technology, 34(4), 34-37.
Descriptionpaper no. 344
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243951
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLavender, HM-
dc.contributor.authorHazell, AAL-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-25T03:01:40Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-25T03:01:40Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citation2017 International Conference on Education, New York, NY, USA, 30 July-3 August 2017. In IACB, ICE & ICTE Conference Proceedings, 2017, p. 344-1-
dc.identifier.issn2157-9660-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243951-
dc.descriptionpaper no. 344-
dc.description.abstractPeer tutoring schemes have long since been recognized as a valuable support system within tertiary education. While some research has focused on the metacognitive gains for peer tutors (Cho & Cho, 2011; Cho & McArthur, 2011; Nicol, Thomson & Breslin, 2011), little has been written about other benefits this type of interaction provides. This paper reports on preliminary research conducted at two Hong Kong universities where peer tutoring schemes are in place. Narrative enquiry into the peer tutors’ experience, and response to their roles showed affective and socio-emotional skills development, which were seen to be beneficial to the tutors as learners and as part of life-long and life-wide skills development. The paper will also explore how peer tutoring schemes not only sit within the literature of social constructivism (Jonassen, 1994) but also link to wider fields of study into workplace and soft skills development. REFERENCES: 1. Cho, Y.H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments. Instructional Science 39(5): 629-643 2. Cho, K., & McArthur, C.(2011). Learning by Reviewing. Journal of Educational Psychology 103(1): 73-84 3. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2011). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014 Vol. 39, No. 1, 102-122 DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.7955.18 4. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational technology, 34(4), 34-37.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherClute Institute for Academic Research.-
dc.relation.ispartof2017 International Conference on Education, New York-
dc.titlePeer Tutoring: Reflective Knowledge Building and Beyond-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailHazell, AAL: ashleyhy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.hkuros275100-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl2157-9660-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats