File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: ‘Asia as Method’ and ‘Asia Literacy’: Post-colonial and post-imperialist epistemologies for transforming ways of knowing and ‘structure of sentiments’

Title‘Asia as Method’ and ‘Asia Literacy’: Post-colonial and post-imperialist epistemologies for transforming ways of knowing and ‘structure of sentiments’
Authors
Issue Date2016
Citation
Mon@ASIA Seminar, Monash Asia Institute, Monash University, Australia, 12 October 2016 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this presentation I shall outline what I think we can learn from the notion of ‘Asia as Method’ as proposed by Taiwan scholar and cultural theorist Chen Kuan-hsing. I shall focus on post-colonial and post-imperialist epistemologies (Chen, 2010; Lin, 2013) and discuss how our sense of cultural self and other is routinely re/produced in everyday discourses. The method of ‘critical syncretism’ and ‘multiplying our references’ is then proposed as a critical proposition to transform existing knowledge structures and simultaneously to transform ourselves (Chen, 2010). Then I shall explore how ‘Asia as method’ can be connected to the notion of ‘Asia literacy’ which is taken not as a static set of skills, knowledges and languages, but more importantly, as ‘learning how to advance a reflexive and open dialogue with oneself, and with others, in an age of global interconnectedness’ (Iwabuchi, 2015).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243434

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, AMY-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-25T02:54:47Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-25T02:54:47Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationMon@ASIA Seminar, Monash Asia Institute, Monash University, Australia, 12 October 2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/243434-
dc.description.abstractIn this presentation I shall outline what I think we can learn from the notion of ‘Asia as Method’ as proposed by Taiwan scholar and cultural theorist Chen Kuan-hsing. I shall focus on post-colonial and post-imperialist epistemologies (Chen, 2010; Lin, 2013) and discuss how our sense of cultural self and other is routinely re/produced in everyday discourses. The method of ‘critical syncretism’ and ‘multiplying our references’ is then proposed as a critical proposition to transform existing knowledge structures and simultaneously to transform ourselves (Chen, 2010). Then I shall explore how ‘Asia as method’ can be connected to the notion of ‘Asia literacy’ which is taken not as a static set of skills, knowledges and languages, but more importantly, as ‘learning how to advance a reflexive and open dialogue with oneself, and with others, in an age of global interconnectedness’ (Iwabuchi, 2015).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofMon@ASIA Seminar-
dc.title‘Asia as Method’ and ‘Asia Literacy’: Post-colonial and post-imperialist epistemologies for transforming ways of knowing and ‘structure of sentiments’-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailLin, AMY: angellin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLin, AMY=rp01355-
dc.identifier.hkuros273694-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats