File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Researcher positionality

TitleResearcher positionality
Authors
Issue Date2015
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc
Citation
Researcher positionality. In Hult, FM & Johnson, DC (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A Practical Guide, p. 21-32. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015 How to Cite?
AbstractLanguage policy and planning (LPP) as a field of studies emerging in 1950s and 1960s has largely been “problem-oriented” and responded to the needs of the newly established states; many of them had just gained independence from their former colonial powers (Spolsky 2008, 137). The early LPP researchers were technical in their orientations, seeing their task as one of planning, standardizing, regulating, containing, or managing linguistic diversity for the national development agendas of building national cohesion and modern economic development. LPP researchers saw their work consisting of status planning, corpus planning (Kloss 1969), and acquisition planning/language education planning. This chapter discusses researcher positionality with reference to three kinds of knowledge-constitutive interest. These will be illustrated with LPP studies in the case of Hong Kong. It outlines some suggestions about how a researcher can think about issues of researcher positionality when they are planning their research study.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227663
ISBN
Series/Report no.Guides to Research Methods in Language and Linguistics

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, AMY-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-18T09:12:06Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-18T09:12:06Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationResearcher positionality. In Hult, FM & Johnson, DC (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A Practical Guide, p. 21-32. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015-
dc.identifier.isbn9781118308387-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/227663-
dc.description.abstractLanguage policy and planning (LPP) as a field of studies emerging in 1950s and 1960s has largely been “problem-oriented” and responded to the needs of the newly established states; many of them had just gained independence from their former colonial powers (Spolsky 2008, 137). The early LPP researchers were technical in their orientations, seeing their task as one of planning, standardizing, regulating, containing, or managing linguistic diversity for the national development agendas of building national cohesion and modern economic development. LPP researchers saw their work consisting of status planning, corpus planning (Kloss 1969), and acquisition planning/language education planning. This chapter discusses researcher positionality with reference to three kinds of knowledge-constitutive interest. These will be illustrated with LPP studies in the case of Hong Kong. It outlines some suggestions about how a researcher can think about issues of researcher positionality when they are planning their research study.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc-
dc.relation.ispartofResearch methods in language policy and planning: A Practical Guide-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGuides to Research Methods in Language and Linguistics-
dc.titleResearcher positionality-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailLin, AMY: angellin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLin, AMY=rp01355-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781118340349-
dc.identifier.hkuros258988-
dc.identifier.spage21-
dc.identifier.epage32-
dc.publisher.placeWest Sussex, UK-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats