File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A systematic review on definitions and assessments of psychotic-like experiences

TitleA systematic review on definitions and assessments of psychotic-like experiences
Authors
KeywordsPsychiatry
Psychotic disorder
Psychotic-like experience
Review
Schizophrenia
Issue Date2016
PublisherBlackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7893
Citation
Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 2016, v. 10 n. 1, p. 3-16 How to Cite?
AbstractAims: Psychotic‐like experiences (PLEs) or subclinical psychotic experiences have received increased attention as some studies have suggested continuity between PLEs and psychotic disorders. However, epidemiological and correlational studies of PLEs showed mixed findings – it is observed that different studies use a wide variety of definitions of PLEs, as well as different assessment tools that are designed to capture such described experiences. The differences in definitions and assessment tools adopted could contribute to the discrepancy of findings. The current review aims to examine the definitions and assessment tools adopted in the studies of PLEs. Methods: Literature search was conducted between October 2013 and February 2014 using three search engines: Medline, Web of Science and PubMed. Results: A total of 76 papers met the selection criteria and were included in the current review. It is found that the majority of papers reviewed defined PLEs quantitatively using assessment tools and do not have a specific phenomenological definition, whereas assessment tools adopted have a wide variety. Furthermore, phenomenological studies of PLEs were rare. Conclusions: The variations in definitions and assessment tools of PLEs might contribute to mixed findings in researches. Reaching to a consensus through the study of phenomenology of PLEs is essential to further advancement of the research in this area.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210784
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.976
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, KW-
dc.contributor.authorChan, KW-
dc.contributor.authorChang, WC-
dc.contributor.authorLee, HME-
dc.contributor.authorHui, CLM-
dc.contributor.authorChen, EYH-
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T05:52:28Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-23T05:52:28Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationEarly Intervention in Psychiatry, 2016, v. 10 n. 1, p. 3-16-
dc.identifier.issn1751-7885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/210784-
dc.description.abstractAims: Psychotic‐like experiences (PLEs) or subclinical psychotic experiences have received increased attention as some studies have suggested continuity between PLEs and psychotic disorders. However, epidemiological and correlational studies of PLEs showed mixed findings – it is observed that different studies use a wide variety of definitions of PLEs, as well as different assessment tools that are designed to capture such described experiences. The differences in definitions and assessment tools adopted could contribute to the discrepancy of findings. The current review aims to examine the definitions and assessment tools adopted in the studies of PLEs. Methods: Literature search was conducted between October 2013 and February 2014 using three search engines: Medline, Web of Science and PubMed. Results: A total of 76 papers met the selection criteria and were included in the current review. It is found that the majority of papers reviewed defined PLEs quantitatively using assessment tools and do not have a specific phenomenological definition, whereas assessment tools adopted have a wide variety. Furthermore, phenomenological studies of PLEs were rare. Conclusions: The variations in definitions and assessment tools of PLEs might contribute to mixed findings in researches. Reaching to a consensus through the study of phenomenology of PLEs is essential to further advancement of the research in this area.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7893-
dc.relation.ispartofEarly Intervention in Psychiatry-
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.subjectPsychiatry-
dc.subjectPsychotic disorder-
dc.subjectPsychotic-like experience-
dc.subjectReview-
dc.subjectSchizophrenia-
dc.titleA systematic review on definitions and assessments of psychotic-like experiences-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, KW: kwsherry@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChang, WC: changwc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLee, HME: edwinlhm@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailHui, CLM: christyh@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChen, EYH: eyhchen@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, KW=rp00539-
dc.identifier.authorityChang, WC=rp01465-
dc.identifier.authorityLee, HME=rp01575-
dc.identifier.authorityHui, CLM=rp01993-
dc.identifier.authorityChen, EYH=rp00392-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eip.12228-
dc.identifier.pmid25772746-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84954027636-
dc.identifier.hkuros243457-
dc.identifier.hkuros264976-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage3-
dc.identifier.epage16-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000367902400001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl1751-7885-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats