File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: The Changing Governance Mechanism and Spatiality of Chinese State: Lessons from Guangzhou-Foshan City Region

TitleThe Changing Governance Mechanism and Spatiality of Chinese State: Lessons from Guangzhou-Foshan City Region
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
The 18th Inter-University Seminar on Asian Megacities (IUSAM), Hong Kong, China, 15-17 August 2013 How to Cite?
AbstractThe changing form of political economy accords a distinctive regime of accumulation and state regulation in Fordism and post-Fordism. This paper advocates an alternative methodological approach of state by reading state spatiality as a self-reflexive attribute integral to the state regulatory capacity. In this paper, the changing mode of regulation and state spatiality will be examined under different regimes of accumulation. New state spatiality embodies as an articulation of both scalar and networked imaginaries. This is followed by examinations of the political economy in China since economic reform and open-up. Three interpretations, namely, local state corporatism, local growth coalition and urban entrepreneurism will be revisited and discussed. These interpretations indicate local state has become an object of regulation. Since 1990s, the scales of political economy restructure upwards to the level of city region. Taking Guangzhou-Foshan city region as a reference, two sets of planning (institutional narratives) are examined with a view to uncovering the dynamics that push city region a new state space. On the new state space where two municipalities could declare collective ownerships, synergic effects fail to take roots because of the organizational complexity in city region governance. City region as new state space in China could not exert full potential due to the lack of communication between different systems of accountability in current administrative system.
DescriptionConference Theme: Asian Urbanism and Beyond
Breakout Session 6
Theme 1: Urban Development
Session 6: Urban Governance
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/202078

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, RCKen_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-21T08:02:58Z-
dc.date.available2014-08-21T08:02:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 18th Inter-University Seminar on Asian Megacities (IUSAM), Hong Kong, China, 15-17 August 2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/202078-
dc.descriptionConference Theme: Asian Urbanism and Beyond-
dc.descriptionBreakout Session 6-
dc.descriptionTheme 1: Urban Development-
dc.descriptionSession 6: Urban Governance-
dc.description.abstractThe changing form of political economy accords a distinctive regime of accumulation and state regulation in Fordism and post-Fordism. This paper advocates an alternative methodological approach of state by reading state spatiality as a self-reflexive attribute integral to the state regulatory capacity. In this paper, the changing mode of regulation and state spatiality will be examined under different regimes of accumulation. New state spatiality embodies as an articulation of both scalar and networked imaginaries. This is followed by examinations of the political economy in China since economic reform and open-up. Three interpretations, namely, local state corporatism, local growth coalition and urban entrepreneurism will be revisited and discussed. These interpretations indicate local state has become an object of regulation. Since 1990s, the scales of political economy restructure upwards to the level of city region. Taking Guangzhou-Foshan city region as a reference, two sets of planning (institutional narratives) are examined with a view to uncovering the dynamics that push city region a new state space. On the new state space where two municipalities could declare collective ownerships, synergic effects fail to take roots because of the organizational complexity in city region governance. City region as new state space in China could not exert full potential due to the lack of communication between different systems of accountability in current administrative system.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInter-University Seminar on Asian Megacities (IUSAM)en_US
dc.titleThe Changing Governance Mechanism and Spatiality of Chinese State: Lessons from Guangzhou-Foshan City Regionen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailChan, RCK: hrxucck@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.hkuros233085en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats