File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: “Beware of the dogs, and the locusts!”: a critical discourse analysis of national identities and discrimination in Hong Kong and Chinese newspapers

Title“Beware of the dogs, and the locusts!”: a critical discourse analysis of national identities and discrimination in Hong Kong and Chinese newspapers
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
The 7th Free Linguistics Conference (FLC 2013), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, 27-28 September 2013. How to Cite?
AbstractIn the first few months of 2012 there were several incidents which brought to the fore tensions between certain groups in Hong Kong and mainland China. This paper contrasts the coverage of these incidents in two Hong Kong newspapers (the SCMP and the Standard) and two Chinese newspapers (the China Daily and the Global Times) to find evidence of discrimination and/or certain ideologies of national identity. The paper also introduces the theoretical frameworks and analytical tools used in the analysis. Discourse analyses have been carried out on the SCMP and the China Daily previously. Flowerdew, Li and Tran (2002) found some evidence of discrimination in the SCMP’s coverage in the right-of-abode issue in 2002 while Li (2009) found evidence that the China Daily promoted certain ideologies of national identity in its reporting of the American spy plane incident in 2001. However, neither the Standard nor the Global Times nor the incidents in 2012 have been subjected to a similar kind of analysis. This paper has four main parts: (1) an outline of the incidents which were covered by the four newspapers; (2) a brief description of the different theoretical frameworks and analytical tools (Critical Discourse Analysis, Systemic Functional Grammar, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Corpus linguistics), and an explanation of how they were used; (3) a discussion of the significant findings in the data; (4) a conclusion section which will argue that there was only slight evidence of the reproduction of ideologies of national identity and of promoting discrimination.
DescriptionIndividual Paper no. 67
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199719

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTait, CDCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T01:30:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T01:30:38Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 7th Free Linguistics Conference (FLC 2013), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China, 27-28 September 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199719-
dc.descriptionIndividual Paper no. 67-
dc.description.abstractIn the first few months of 2012 there were several incidents which brought to the fore tensions between certain groups in Hong Kong and mainland China. This paper contrasts the coverage of these incidents in two Hong Kong newspapers (the SCMP and the Standard) and two Chinese newspapers (the China Daily and the Global Times) to find evidence of discrimination and/or certain ideologies of national identity. The paper also introduces the theoretical frameworks and analytical tools used in the analysis. Discourse analyses have been carried out on the SCMP and the China Daily previously. Flowerdew, Li and Tran (2002) found some evidence of discrimination in the SCMP’s coverage in the right-of-abode issue in 2002 while Li (2009) found evidence that the China Daily promoted certain ideologies of national identity in its reporting of the American spy plane incident in 2001. However, neither the Standard nor the Global Times nor the incidents in 2012 have been subjected to a similar kind of analysis. This paper has four main parts: (1) an outline of the incidents which were covered by the four newspapers; (2) a brief description of the different theoretical frameworks and analytical tools (Critical Discourse Analysis, Systemic Functional Grammar, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Corpus linguistics), and an explanation of how they were used; (3) a discussion of the significant findings in the data; (4) a conclusion section which will argue that there was only slight evidence of the reproduction of ideologies of national identity and of promoting discrimination.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartof7th Free Linguistics Conference, FLC 2013en_US
dc.title“Beware of the dogs, and the locusts!”: a critical discourse analysis of national identities and discrimination in Hong Kong and Chinese newspapersen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailTait, CDC: ctait@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.hkuros231006en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats