File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are: implicit theories and adjustment outcomes

TitleHow you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are: implicit theories and adjustment outcomes
Authors
KeywordsAdjustment
Entity
Filipino
Implicit theories of intelligence
Incremental
Well-being
Issue Date2012
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/paid
Citation
Personality and Individual Differences, 2012, v. 53 n. 5, p. 705-709 How to Cite?
AbstractIndividuals hold different views towards their IQ, with some people seeing it as relatively fixed and others seeing it as malleable. Individual differences in these beliefs (implicit theories of intelligence) have been shown to influence a wide range of achievement-related outcomes in school. However, the impact of these implicit theories of intelligence on a broader range of adjustment outcomes beyond the school domain has been relatively unexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine how implicit theories of intelligence are related to a wider range of adjustment and well-being outcomes. Results of the study indicated that viewing intelligence as fixed (entity theory) is associated with more maladaptive outcomes. Viewing intelligence as malleable (incremental theory) has been found to be more optimal. Implications and directions for future research are discussed. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/164709
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.463
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKing, RBen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T08:08:07Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T08:08:07Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationPersonality and Individual Differences, 2012, v. 53 n. 5, p. 705-709en_US
dc.identifier.issn0191-8869-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/164709-
dc.description.abstractIndividuals hold different views towards their IQ, with some people seeing it as relatively fixed and others seeing it as malleable. Individual differences in these beliefs (implicit theories of intelligence) have been shown to influence a wide range of achievement-related outcomes in school. However, the impact of these implicit theories of intelligence on a broader range of adjustment outcomes beyond the school domain has been relatively unexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine how implicit theories of intelligence are related to a wider range of adjustment and well-being outcomes. Results of the study indicated that viewing intelligence as fixed (entity theory) is associated with more maladaptive outcomes. Viewing intelligence as malleable (incremental theory) has been found to be more optimal. Implications and directions for future research are discussed. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/paiden_US
dc.relation.ispartofPersonality and Individual Differencesen_US
dc.subjectAdjustment-
dc.subjectEntity-
dc.subjectFilipino-
dc.subjectImplicit theories of intelligence-
dc.subjectIncremental-
dc.subjectWell-being-
dc.titleHow you think about your intelligence influences how adjusted you are: implicit theories and adjustment outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailKing, RB: ronnel.king@gmail.com-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.031-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84863775255-
dc.identifier.hkuros211019en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage705en_US
dc.identifier.epage709en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000307132100031-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.citeulike10864903-
dc.identifier.issnl0191-8869-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats