File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Performance study of multiple access control protocols for wireless multimedia services

TitlePerformance study of multiple access control protocols for wireless multimedia services
Authors
Issue Date2000
Citation
International Conference On Network Protocols, 2000, p. 283-292 How to Cite?
AbstractThe multiple access control (MAC) problem in a wireless network has intrigued researchers for years. For a broadband wireless multimedia network such as wireless ATM, an effective MAC protocol is very much desired because efficient allocation of channel bandwidth is imperative in accommodating a large user population with satisfactory quality of service. Indeed, MAC protocols for a wireless ATM network, in which user traffic requirements are highly heterogeneous (classified into CBR, VBR, and ABR), are even more intricate to design. Considerable research efforts expended in tackling the problem have resulted in a myriad of MAC protocols. While each protocol is individually shown to be effective by the respective designers, it is unclear how these different protocols compare against each other on a unified basis. In this paper, we quantitatively compare seven recently proposed TDMA-based MAC protocols for integrated wireless data and voice services. We first propose a taxonomy of TDMA-based protocols, from which we carefully select seven protocols, namely SCAMA, DTDMA/VR, DTDMA/PR, DQRUMA, DPRMA, DSA++, and PRMA/DA, such that they are devised based on rather orthogonal design philosophies. The objective of our comparison is to highlight the merits and demerits of different protocol designs.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/158305

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwok, YuKwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorLau, Vincent KNen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:58:59Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:58:59Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Conference On Network Protocols, 2000, p. 283-292en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/158305-
dc.description.abstractThe multiple access control (MAC) problem in a wireless network has intrigued researchers for years. For a broadband wireless multimedia network such as wireless ATM, an effective MAC protocol is very much desired because efficient allocation of channel bandwidth is imperative in accommodating a large user population with satisfactory quality of service. Indeed, MAC protocols for a wireless ATM network, in which user traffic requirements are highly heterogeneous (classified into CBR, VBR, and ABR), are even more intricate to design. Considerable research efforts expended in tackling the problem have resulted in a myriad of MAC protocols. While each protocol is individually shown to be effective by the respective designers, it is unclear how these different protocols compare against each other on a unified basis. In this paper, we quantitatively compare seven recently proposed TDMA-based MAC protocols for integrated wireless data and voice services. We first propose a taxonomy of TDMA-based protocols, from which we carefully select seven protocols, namely SCAMA, DTDMA/VR, DTDMA/PR, DQRUMA, DPRMA, DSA++, and PRMA/DA, such that they are devised based on rather orthogonal design philosophies. The objective of our comparison is to highlight the merits and demerits of different protocol designs.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Conference on Network Protocolsen_US
dc.titlePerformance study of multiple access control protocols for wireless multimedia servicesen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailKwok, YuKwong:ykwok@eee.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityKwok, YuKwong=rp00128en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0034516191en_US
dc.identifier.spage283en_US
dc.identifier.epage292en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKwok, YuKwong=7101857718en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, Vincent KN=7005811464en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats