File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A model of planning by contract: Integrating comprehensive state planning, freedom of contract, public participation and fidelity

TitleA model of planning by contract: Integrating comprehensive state planning, freedom of contract, public participation and fidelity
Authors
KeywordsDevelopment theory
Ethics
Local participation
Modeling
Planning theory
Issue Date2010
PublisherLiverpool University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.liverpool-unipress.co.uk/journals_2.html
Citation
Town Planning Review, 2010, v. 81 n. 6, p. 647-673 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper explains the history and problems of the traditional plan-market dichotomy and characterises and defends an ideal type model of 'planning by contract'. As illustrated by a discussion of a real-world shadow of the model adopted in Hong Kong, which has been duplicated in China under the 'land use rights reform', this model avoids the extant problem of the idea of 'planning by contract' by combining comprehensive government planning backed by public participation with development based on market forces. This combination is novel not only because it is in line with both a theory of communicative planning and innovation and a social contract based on private property in both positive and normative terms, but also because it invokes the concepts of fidelity and love omitted by most public interest theses on planning.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134450
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.701
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLai, LWCen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-17T09:21:07Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-17T09:21:07Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationTown Planning Review, 2010, v. 81 n. 6, p. 647-673en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0041-0020en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134450-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explains the history and problems of the traditional plan-market dichotomy and characterises and defends an ideal type model of 'planning by contract'. As illustrated by a discussion of a real-world shadow of the model adopted in Hong Kong, which has been duplicated in China under the 'land use rights reform', this model avoids the extant problem of the idea of 'planning by contract' by combining comprehensive government planning backed by public participation with development based on market forces. This combination is novel not only because it is in line with both a theory of communicative planning and innovation and a social contract based on private property in both positive and normative terms, but also because it invokes the concepts of fidelity and love omitted by most public interest theses on planning.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherLiverpool University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.liverpool-unipress.co.uk/journals_2.htmlen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofTown Planning Reviewen_HK
dc.subjectDevelopment theory-
dc.subjectEthics-
dc.subjectLocal participation-
dc.subjectModeling-
dc.subjectPlanning theory-
dc.titleA model of planning by contract: Integrating comprehensive state planning, freedom of contract, public participation and fidelityen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0041-0020&volume=81&issue=6&spage=647&epage=673&date=2010&atitle=A+model+of+planning+by+contract:+Integrating+comprehensive+state+planning,+freedom+of+contract,+public+participation+and+fidelity-
dc.identifier.emailLai, LWC:wclai@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLai, LWC=rp01004en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3828/tpr.2010.25en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-78650587029en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros185712en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650587029&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume81en_HK
dc.identifier.issue6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage647en_HK
dc.identifier.epage673en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000213971800007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLai, LWC=7202616218en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0041-0020-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats