File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Conference Paper: The pupil old/new effect in veridical and false recognition memory

TitleThe pupil old/new effect in veridical and false recognition memory
Authors
Issue Date2009
Citation
The 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Boston, MA., 19-22 November 2009. In Abstracts of the Psychonomics Society, 2009, v. 14, p. 154, poster no. 5043 How to Cite?
AbstractResearch has identified a pupil old/new effect: Our pupils dilate to a greater extent when we are presented with previously studied (old) items, as compared with new items. It is not yet clear what specific memory processes give rise to this effect. Using the remember–know procedure, we found that the effect was greater for items that were consciously recollected, as opposed to those that were known. We replicated the effect for auditory stimuli, ruling out any explanation of the effect based purely on visual processing. In addition, the pupil old/new effect was greatest for items that were initially encoded with a semantic orienting instruction, as compared with those encoded with a more surface orienting instruction. Using a modified Deese/Roediger–McDermott task, pupil size also increased when participants made false old responses. We conclude that the pupil old/new effect reflects a combined strength of memory signal.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/127532

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHutton, SBen_HK
dc.contributor.authorOtero, S-
dc.contributor.authorWeekes, BS-
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-31T13:31:00Z-
dc.date.available2010-10-31T13:31:00Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Boston, MA., 19-22 November 2009. In Abstracts of the Psychonomics Society, 2009, v. 14, p. 154, poster no. 5043en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/127532-
dc.description.abstractResearch has identified a pupil old/new effect: Our pupils dilate to a greater extent when we are presented with previously studied (old) items, as compared with new items. It is not yet clear what specific memory processes give rise to this effect. Using the remember–know procedure, we found that the effect was greater for items that were consciously recollected, as opposed to those that were known. We replicated the effect for auditory stimuli, ruling out any explanation of the effect based purely on visual processing. In addition, the pupil old/new effect was greatest for items that were initially encoded with a semantic orienting instruction, as compared with those encoded with a more surface orienting instruction. Using a modified Deese/Roediger–McDermott task, pupil size also increased when participants made false old responses. We conclude that the pupil old/new effect reflects a combined strength of memory signal.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAbstracts of the Psychonomics Society-
dc.titleThe pupil old/new effect in veridical and false recognition memoryen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailWeekes, BS: weekes@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros179860en_HK
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.spage154-
dc.identifier.epage154-
dc.description.otherThe 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomics Society, Boston, MA., 19-22 November 2009. In Abstracts of the Psychonomics Society, 2009, v. 14, p. 154, poster no. 5043-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats