File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Conference Paper: Use of multiple imputation on Linear Mixed Model and Generalized Estimating Equations for longitudinal data analysis: a simulation sStudy

TitleUse of multiple imputation on Linear Mixed Model and Generalized Estimating Equations for longitudinal data analysis: a simulation sStudy
Authors
Issue Date2006
Citation
The 13th International Conference of the Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics on Interdisciplinary Mathematical and Statistical Techniques (SCRA 2006-FIM XIII), Lisbon, Portugal, 1-4 September 2006. How to Cite?
AbstractLongitudinal studies are useful in medical and health sciences research to examine effects associated with time. However, longitudinal analysis may be complicated by the presence of missing values. The mixed effects model (MEM) and the generalized estimating equations (GEE) are common methods for analyzing incomplete longitudinal data. Both of them make use of all available data and thus are more appealing to other methods that cater subjects with complete data only. Alternatively, multiple imputation (MI) emerged as a method to facilitate the use of methods that do not accommodate missing values. Nevertheless, it was used together with MEM or GEE as a 3-step process: 1. created multiple datasets with missing values imputed; 2. perform MEM or GEE on each dataset; 3. combine results. There was recently an interest in comparing estimates with and without the use of different imputation methods on MEM and GEE. However, the literature has not examined the use of MI with MEM and GEE in a clinical trial setting when the objective is to determine the treatment effect at specific time epochs. Also, there has been no evaluation of using MI with MEM and GEE when missing values are not occurring at random. Therefore, we performed a simulation study to assess the performance of using MI on MEM and GEE under the three missing value mechanisms: missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR). The additional use of MI generally led to overly estimated variances and may yield estimates more biased than the use of last observation carried forward (LOCF). Under MCAR and MAR, MEM or GEE alone yielded unbiased estimates and had good coverage. Under MNAR, there was serious bias in all methods but the use of MEM or GEE alone remained not the worst compared to other methods. Comparisons of the use of MI and LOCF on MEM and GEE were also made in a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/101753

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFong, DYTen_HK
dc.contributor.authorRai, SNen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLam, KSLen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-25T20:02:55Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-25T20:02:55Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 13th International Conference of the Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics on Interdisciplinary Mathematical and Statistical Techniques (SCRA 2006-FIM XIII), Lisbon, Portugal, 1-4 September 2006.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/101753-
dc.description.abstractLongitudinal studies are useful in medical and health sciences research to examine effects associated with time. However, longitudinal analysis may be complicated by the presence of missing values. The mixed effects model (MEM) and the generalized estimating equations (GEE) are common methods for analyzing incomplete longitudinal data. Both of them make use of all available data and thus are more appealing to other methods that cater subjects with complete data only. Alternatively, multiple imputation (MI) emerged as a method to facilitate the use of methods that do not accommodate missing values. Nevertheless, it was used together with MEM or GEE as a 3-step process: 1. created multiple datasets with missing values imputed; 2. perform MEM or GEE on each dataset; 3. combine results. There was recently an interest in comparing estimates with and without the use of different imputation methods on MEM and GEE. However, the literature has not examined the use of MI with MEM and GEE in a clinical trial setting when the objective is to determine the treatment effect at specific time epochs. Also, there has been no evaluation of using MI with MEM and GEE when missing values are not occurring at random. Therefore, we performed a simulation study to assess the performance of using MI on MEM and GEE under the three missing value mechanisms: missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR). The additional use of MI generally led to overly estimated variances and may yield estimates more biased than the use of last observation carried forward (LOCF). Under MCAR and MAR, MEM or GEE alone yielded unbiased estimates and had good coverage. Under MNAR, there was serious bias in all methods but the use of MEM or GEE alone remained not the worst compared to other methods. Comparisons of the use of MI and LOCF on MEM and GEE were also made in a randomized controlled clinical trial.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Conference of the Forum for Interdisciplinary Mathematics on Interdisciplinary Mathematical & Statistical Techniques, SCRA 2006-FIM XIIIen_HK
dc.titleUse of multiple imputation on Linear Mixed Model and Generalized Estimating Equations for longitudinal data analysis: a simulation sStudyen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailFong, DYT: dytfong@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLam, KSL: ksllam@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLam, KSL=rp00343en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros119977en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats