File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: The psychometrics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Chinese Primary Care Patients
Title | The psychometrics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Chinese Primary Care Patients |
---|---|
Other Titles | The Psychometrics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for Chinese Patients in Primary Care Setting |
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2015 |
Publisher | The Hong Kong College of Family Physicians. |
Citation | The 2015 Hong Kong Primary Care Conference (HKPCC 2015): Stay Caring, Go Excelling in Primary Care, Hong Kong, 30-31 May 2015. In Programme book, p. 53 How to Cite? |
Abstract | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish the factor structure, construct validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of the CES-D for Chinese patients.in primary care setting.
METHOD: 3686 subjects were included in this prospective longitudinal study. The factor structure was evaluated by CFA. The internal construct validity was assessed by corrected item-total correlation. The convergent validity was assessed by examining the correlations between CES-D, PHQ-9 and SF-12 v 2 MCS. Instrument reliability was assessed by examining the internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability. Sensitivity was determined by calculating the AUC. The internal and external responsiveness was assessed.
RESULTS: The data fitted the four-factor structure. Corrected item-total correlations were 0.4 for most items. The CES-D had a strong correlation with the PHQ-9 and SF-12 v2 MCS. The CES-D showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.89) and good test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.91, paired t-test p-value >0.05). The CES-D was sensitive in detecting differences between groups, with the AUC >0.7. Internal responsiveness to detect positive and negative changes was satisfactory. The CES-D was externally responsive, with the AUC>0.7.
DISCUSSION: The CES-D is valid and reliable. The instrument is sensitive enough to screen for depression and responsive enough to longitudinally monitor patients in primary care. |
Description | Free Paper Competition – Abstracts of Poster Presentation - Poster Presentation no. 3 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/216061 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chin, WY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, PH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, KTY | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-21T13:52:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-21T13:52:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 2015 Hong Kong Primary Care Conference (HKPCC 2015): Stay Caring, Go Excelling in Primary Care, Hong Kong, 30-31 May 2015. In Programme book, p. 53 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/216061 | - |
dc.description | Free Paper Competition – Abstracts of Poster Presentation - Poster Presentation no. 3 | - |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish the factor structure, construct validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of the CES-D for Chinese patients.in primary care setting. METHOD: 3686 subjects were included in this prospective longitudinal study. The factor structure was evaluated by CFA. The internal construct validity was assessed by corrected item-total correlation. The convergent validity was assessed by examining the correlations between CES-D, PHQ-9 and SF-12 v 2 MCS. Instrument reliability was assessed by examining the internal consistency and 2-week test-retest reliability. Sensitivity was determined by calculating the AUC. The internal and external responsiveness was assessed. RESULTS: The data fitted the four-factor structure. Corrected item-total correlations were 0.4 for most items. The CES-D had a strong correlation with the PHQ-9 and SF-12 v2 MCS. The CES-D showed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.89) and good test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.91, paired t-test p-value >0.05). The CES-D was sensitive in detecting differences between groups, with the AUC >0.7. Internal responsiveness to detect positive and negative changes was satisfactory. The CES-D was externally responsive, with the AUC>0.7. DISCUSSION: The CES-D is valid and reliable. The instrument is sensitive enough to screen for depression and responsive enough to longitudinally monitor patients in primary care. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | The Hong Kong College of Family Physicians. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Hong Kong Primary Care Conference, HKPCC 2015 | - |
dc.title | The psychometrics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Chinese Primary Care Patients | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Psychometrics of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) for Chinese Patients in Primary Care Setting | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chin, WY: chinwy@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Choi, PH: h0714919@connect.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, KTY: ktychan@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chin, WY=rp00290 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Choi, PH=rp02329 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 249096 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 53 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 53 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | - |