File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Linnaeus and Chinese plants: A test of the linguistic imperialism thesis

TitleLinnaeus and Chinese plants: A test of the linguistic imperialism thesis
Authors
KeywordsGinseng
Hortus Malabaricus
Joseph Needham
Linnaeus
Osbeck
Tea
Issue Date2010
PublisherThe Royal Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/index.cfm?page=1083#
Citation
Notes And Records Of The Royal Society, 2010, v. 64 n. 2, p. 121-138 How to Cite?
AbstractIt has been alleged that Carolus Linnaeus practised Eurocentrism, sexism and racism in naming plant genera after famous botanists, and excluding 'barbarous names'. He has therefore been said to practise 'linguistic imperialism'. This paper examines whether Linnaeus applied 'linguistic imperialism' to the naming of Chinese plants. On the basis of examples such as Thea (1/4Camellia), Urena, Basella, Annona, Sapindus (1/4Koelreuteria), and Panax, I conclude that Linnaeus used generic names of diverse origins. However, he misidentified Chinese plants' habitats, and acted on these misapprehensions. © 2009 The Royal Society.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90309
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.133
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCook, Aen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T10:08:30Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T10:08:30Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationNotes And Records Of The Royal Society, 2010, v. 64 n. 2, p. 121-138en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0035-9149en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90309-
dc.description.abstractIt has been alleged that Carolus Linnaeus practised Eurocentrism, sexism and racism in naming plant genera after famous botanists, and excluding 'barbarous names'. He has therefore been said to practise 'linguistic imperialism'. This paper examines whether Linnaeus applied 'linguistic imperialism' to the naming of Chinese plants. On the basis of examples such as Thea (1/4Camellia), Urena, Basella, Annona, Sapindus (1/4Koelreuteria), and Panax, I conclude that Linnaeus used generic names of diverse origins. However, he misidentified Chinese plants' habitats, and acted on these misapprehensions. © 2009 The Royal Society.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherThe Royal Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/index.cfm?page=1083#en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofNotes and Records of the Royal Societyen_HK
dc.subjectGinsengen_HK
dc.subjectHortus Malabaricusen_HK
dc.subjectJoseph Needhamen_HK
dc.subjectLinnaeusen_HK
dc.subjectOsbecken_HK
dc.subjectTeaen_HK
dc.titleLinnaeus and Chinese plants: A test of the linguistic imperialism thesisen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0035-9149&volume=64&spage=121&epage=38&date=2009&atitle=Linnaeus+and+Chinese+plants:+a+test+of+the+linguistic+imperialism+thesisen_HK
dc.identifier.emailCook, A: cookga@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCook, A=rp01219en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsnr.2009.0051en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-77952967121en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros163576en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952967121&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume64en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage121en_HK
dc.identifier.epage138en_HK
dc.identifier.eissn1743-0178-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000277392500003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCook, A=16066639200en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike7157000-
dc.identifier.issnl0035-9149-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats