File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional, and vascular ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity between 2 consecutive stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles

TitleComparison of 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional, and vascular ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity between 2 consecutive stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles
Authors
Keywords3-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography
Endometrial receptivity
Ultrasonographic parameters
Issue Date2007
PublisherAmerican Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.aium.org/publications/jum/subIndv.asp
Citation
Journal Of Ultrasound In Medicine, 2007, v. 26 n. 7, p. 931-939 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective. We compared the ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity between 2 consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the same patients. Methods. Patients who had undergone 2 in vitro fertilization cycles between November 2002 and December 2004 were recruited. A 3-dimensional ultrasonographic examination with power Doppler imaging was performed on the day of oocyte retrieval to determine the endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, pulsatility and resistive indices of uterine vessels, endometrial volume, vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization flow index of endometrial and subendometrial regions. Results. Of 662 patients, 95 (14.4%) underwent 2 consecutive cycles using the same stimulation regimen during the study period. There were no significant differences in these ultrasonographic parameters between the first and second cycles. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for endometrial volume was significantly higher than that of other ultrasonographic parameters. The ICC for the endometrial thickness, uterine pulsatility index, and endometrial 3-dimensional power Doppler flow indices were similar. Conclusions. Ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity were comparable in the 2 consecutive stimulated cycles. The endometrial volume had the highest ICC among these ultrasonographic parameters and was most reproducible between 2 cycles. © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/87279
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.754
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.574
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, EHYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, CCWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorOi, STen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPak, CHen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:27:38Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:27:38Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Ultrasound In Medicine, 2007, v. 26 n. 7, p. 931-939en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0278-4297en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/87279-
dc.description.abstractObjective. We compared the ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity between 2 consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the same patients. Methods. Patients who had undergone 2 in vitro fertilization cycles between November 2002 and December 2004 were recruited. A 3-dimensional ultrasonographic examination with power Doppler imaging was performed on the day of oocyte retrieval to determine the endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, pulsatility and resistive indices of uterine vessels, endometrial volume, vascularization index, flow index, and vascularization flow index of endometrial and subendometrial regions. Results. Of 662 patients, 95 (14.4%) underwent 2 consecutive cycles using the same stimulation regimen during the study period. There were no significant differences in these ultrasonographic parameters between the first and second cycles. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for endometrial volume was significantly higher than that of other ultrasonographic parameters. The ICC for the endometrial thickness, uterine pulsatility index, and endometrial 3-dimensional power Doppler flow indices were similar. Conclusions. Ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity were comparable in the 2 consecutive stimulated cycles. The endometrial volume had the highest ICC among these ultrasonographic parameters and was most reproducible between 2 cycles. © 2007 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.aium.org/publications/jum/subIndv.aspen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ultrasound in Medicineen_HK
dc.subject3-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonographyen_HK
dc.subjectEndometrial receptivityen_HK
dc.subjectUltrasonographic parametersen_HK
dc.titleComparison of 2-dimensional, 3-dimensional, and vascular ultrasonographic parameters for endometrial receptivity between 2 consecutive stimulated in vitro fertilization cyclesen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0278-4297&volume=26&issue=7&spage=931&epage=939&date=2007&atitle=Comparison+of+2-Dimensional,+3-Dimensional,+and+vascular+ultrasonographic+parameters+for+endometrial+receptivity+between+2+consecutive+stimulated+in+vitro+fertilization+cyclesen_HK
dc.identifier.emailNg, EHY:nghye@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailPak, CH:pcho@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityNg, EHY=rp00426en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPak, CH=rp00325en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.7863/jum.2007.26.7.931-
dc.identifier.pmid17592056-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-34447127468en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros150230en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-34447127468&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume26en_HK
dc.identifier.issue7en_HK
dc.identifier.spage931en_HK
dc.identifier.epage939en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000247801900009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, EHY=35238184300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, CCW=26643394500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOi, ST=7103241843en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPak, CH=7402211440en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0278-4297-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats