File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: Results of current surgical management

TitleEsophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: Results of current surgical management
Authors
Issue Date1998
PublisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.annalsofsurgery.com
Citation
Annals Of Surgery, 1998, v. 227 n. 3, p. 357-364 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: This study aims to evaluate the risk of esophagectomy in the elderly compared with younger patients and to determine whether results of esophagectomy in the elderly have improved in recent years. Summary Background Data: An increased life expectancy has led to more elderly patients presenting with carcinoma of the esophagus in recent years. Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and advanced age is often considered a relative contraindication to esophagectomy despite advances in modem surgical practice. Methods: The perioperative outcome and long-term survival of 167 elderly patients (70 years or more) with esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus were compared with findings in 570 younger patients with esophagetomy in the period 1982 to 1996. Changes in perioperative outcome and survival between 1982 to 1989 and 1990 to 1996 were separately analyzed. Results: The resection rate in the elderly was 48% (167/345), lower than the 65% (570/874) resection rate in younger patients (p < 0.001). There were significantly more preoperative risk factors and postoperative medical complications in the elderly, but no significant differences were observed in surgical complications. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in the elderly (7.2%) than in younger patients (3.0%) (p = 0.02), but the hospital mortality rate was not significantly different in the elderly (18.0%) and younger age groups (14.4%) (p = 0.27). The long-term survival after curative resection in elderly patients was worse than younger patients (p = 0.01). However, when deaths from unrelated medical conditions were excluded from analysis, survival was similar between the two age groups (p = 0.23). A comparison of data for the periods 1982 to 1989 and 1990 to 1996 revealed that the resection rate had increased from 44% to 54% in the elderly, with significantly fewer postoperative complications and lower 30-day and hospital mortality rates. Long-term survival has also improved, although this has not reached a statistically significant level. Conclusions: With current surgical management, esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus can be carried out with acceptable risk in the elderly, but intensive perioperative support is required. The improved results of asophagectomy in the elderly in recent years are attributed to increased experience and better perioperative management. Long-term survival was similar to that of younger patients, excluding deaths caused by unrelated medical conditions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/84168
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 13.787
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.153
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPoon, RTPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLaw, SYKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChu, KMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBranicki, FJen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T08:49:45Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T08:49:45Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAnnals Of Surgery, 1998, v. 227 n. 3, p. 357-364en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/84168-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aims to evaluate the risk of esophagectomy in the elderly compared with younger patients and to determine whether results of esophagectomy in the elderly have improved in recent years. Summary Background Data: An increased life expectancy has led to more elderly patients presenting with carcinoma of the esophagus in recent years. Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and advanced age is often considered a relative contraindication to esophagectomy despite advances in modem surgical practice. Methods: The perioperative outcome and long-term survival of 167 elderly patients (70 years or more) with esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus were compared with findings in 570 younger patients with esophagetomy in the period 1982 to 1996. Changes in perioperative outcome and survival between 1982 to 1989 and 1990 to 1996 were separately analyzed. Results: The resection rate in the elderly was 48% (167/345), lower than the 65% (570/874) resection rate in younger patients (p < 0.001). There were significantly more preoperative risk factors and postoperative medical complications in the elderly, but no significant differences were observed in surgical complications. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in the elderly (7.2%) than in younger patients (3.0%) (p = 0.02), but the hospital mortality rate was not significantly different in the elderly (18.0%) and younger age groups (14.4%) (p = 0.27). The long-term survival after curative resection in elderly patients was worse than younger patients (p = 0.01). However, when deaths from unrelated medical conditions were excluded from analysis, survival was similar between the two age groups (p = 0.23). A comparison of data for the periods 1982 to 1989 and 1990 to 1996 revealed that the resection rate had increased from 44% to 54% in the elderly, with significantly fewer postoperative complications and lower 30-day and hospital mortality rates. Long-term survival has also improved, although this has not reached a statistically significant level. Conclusions: With current surgical management, esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus can be carried out with acceptable risk in the elderly, but intensive perioperative support is required. The improved results of asophagectomy in the elderly in recent years are attributed to increased experience and better perioperative management. Long-term survival was similar to that of younger patients, excluding deaths caused by unrelated medical conditions.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.annalsofsurgery.comen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Surgeryen_HK
dc.rightsAnnals of Surgery. Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.en_HK
dc.titleEsophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: Results of current surgical managementen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0003-4932&volume=227&spage=357&epage=364&date=1998&atitle=Esophagectomy+for+carcinoma+of+the+esophagus+in+the+elderly+-+results+of+current+surgical+managementen_HK
dc.identifier.emailPoon, RTP: poontp@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLaw, SYK: slaw@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailChu, KM: chukm@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailWong, J: jwong@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPoon, RTP=rp00446en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLaw, SYK=rp00437en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChu, KM=rp00435en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityWong, J=rp00322en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/00000658-199803000-00007en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid9527058-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC1191273-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0031913206en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros32965en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031913206&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume227en_HK
dc.identifier.issue3en_HK
dc.identifier.spage357en_HK
dc.identifier.epage364en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000072608200007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPoon, RTP=7103097223en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLaw, SYK=7202241293en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChu, KM=7402453538en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBranicki, FJ=7003617514en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, J=8049324500en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0003-4932-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats