File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of different casting methods on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

TitleEffect of different casting methods on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
Issue Date2003
PublisherInforma Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03093646.asp
Citation
Prosthetics And Orthotics International, 2003, v. 27 n. 2, p. 121-131 How to Cite?
AbstractScoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity. Although orthotic treatment for moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been well recognized, there are few studies documenting the effectiveness of different casting methods in the fabrication of thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthoses (TLSO). The current study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of two commonly used casting methods namely, the frame casting method and the supine with traction casting method in the treatment of AIS. Eighty (80) female patients with AIS were recruited and they were all treated by TLSOs. The frame casting method was used in 37 patients while the remaining 43 patients were under the supine with traction casting method. The responses of spinal deformities under the two different casting methods were analyzed for the period from pre-brace to 2 years after bracing. The studied parameters included the AP Cobb's angle, the apical vertebral rotation and the trunk listing (cervico-sacral lateral offset). The results of the current study showed that the orthoses manufactured from the two casting methods could provide an effective control of AIS (change of Cobb's angle within (±5°). For the frame casting, the Cobb's angles at pre-brace and 2 years after off-brace were 36.0° and 33.8° respectively while for the supine with traction casting, the corresponding Cobb's angles were 32.7° and 34.0°. The frame casting method could give a better control of the apical vertebral rotation at the early stage of treatment (pre-brace=18.2° and the 4th month=13.8° while the supine with traction casting method was more effective in the long-term control of the trunk listing (pre-brace=10mm and 2 years after off-brace=3.3mm).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/79376
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 1.672
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.729
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, MSen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLee, JTCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLuk, KDKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, LCKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T07:53:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T07:53:59Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_HK
dc.identifier.citationProsthetics And Orthotics International, 2003, v. 27 n. 2, p. 121-131en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0309-3646en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/79376-
dc.description.abstractScoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity. Although orthotic treatment for moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been well recognized, there are few studies documenting the effectiveness of different casting methods in the fabrication of thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthoses (TLSO). The current study was a retrospective clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of two commonly used casting methods namely, the frame casting method and the supine with traction casting method in the treatment of AIS. Eighty (80) female patients with AIS were recruited and they were all treated by TLSOs. The frame casting method was used in 37 patients while the remaining 43 patients were under the supine with traction casting method. The responses of spinal deformities under the two different casting methods were analyzed for the period from pre-brace to 2 years after bracing. The studied parameters included the AP Cobb's angle, the apical vertebral rotation and the trunk listing (cervico-sacral lateral offset). The results of the current study showed that the orthoses manufactured from the two casting methods could provide an effective control of AIS (change of Cobb's angle within (±5°). For the frame casting, the Cobb's angles at pre-brace and 2 years after off-brace were 36.0° and 33.8° respectively while for the supine with traction casting, the corresponding Cobb's angles were 32.7° and 34.0°. The frame casting method could give a better control of the apical vertebral rotation at the early stage of treatment (pre-brace=18.2° and the 4th month=13.8° while the supine with traction casting method was more effective in the long-term control of the trunk listing (pre-brace=10mm and 2 years after off-brace=3.3mm).en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/03093646.aspen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofProsthetics and Orthotics Internationalen_HK
dc.rightsProsthetics and Orthotics International. Copyright © Informa Healthcare.en_HK
dc.titleEffect of different casting methods on adolescent idiopathic scoliosisen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0309-3646&volume=23&spage=121&epage=131&date=2003&atitle=Effect+of+different+casting+methods+on+adolescent+idiopathic+scoliosisen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLuk, KDK:hcm21000@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLuk, KDK=rp00333en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03093640308726668-
dc.identifier.pmid14571942-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0141921566en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros88043en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141921566&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume27en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage121en_HK
dc.identifier.epage131en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000185628100007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, MS=23394345200en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, JTC=7601461779en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLuk, KDK=7201921573en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, LCK=36985742600en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0309-3646-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats