File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Tests of cold-formed stainless steel tubular flexural members

TitleTests of cold-formed stainless steel tubular flexural members
Authors
KeywordsBending
Cold-formed steel
Design strength
Experimental investigation
Flexural members
Square and rectangular hollow sections
Stainless steel
Tubular sections
Issue Date2005
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tws
Citation
Thin-Walled Structures, 2005, v. 43 n. 9, p. 1325-1337 How to Cite?
AbstractA series of tests on cold-formed stainless steel square and rectangular hollow sections subjected to major axis bending is presented in this paper. The tests were performed on sections fabricated by cold-rolling from normal strength material of austenitic stainless steel type 304, and high strength material of duplex and high strength austenitic steel sheets. Tensile coupon tests were conducted to obtain the material properties of the test specimens. The test strengths were compared with the design strengths obtained using the American Specification and Australian/New Zealand Standard for stainless steel structures. The North American Specification for cold-formed carbon steel structural members was also used to predict and compare the bending strengths. In addition, the test strengths were compared with the theoretical elastic and plastic bending moments. It is shown that the design strengths predicted by the three specifications and the theoretical bending moments are generally conservative for the tested specimens. The reliability analysis was performed to evaluate the reliability of the design rules based on the existing resistance factors and load combination specified in the aforementioned specifications. It is shown that the American Specification and North American Specification are reliable for both normal and high strength specimens. The Australian/New Zealand Standard is reliable for normal strength specimens, but slightly unreliable for high strength specimens. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/71491
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.527
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Fen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Ben_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T06:32:28Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T06:32:28Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThin-Walled Structures, 2005, v. 43 n. 9, p. 1325-1337en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0263-8231en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/71491-
dc.description.abstractA series of tests on cold-formed stainless steel square and rectangular hollow sections subjected to major axis bending is presented in this paper. The tests were performed on sections fabricated by cold-rolling from normal strength material of austenitic stainless steel type 304, and high strength material of duplex and high strength austenitic steel sheets. Tensile coupon tests were conducted to obtain the material properties of the test specimens. The test strengths were compared with the design strengths obtained using the American Specification and Australian/New Zealand Standard for stainless steel structures. The North American Specification for cold-formed carbon steel structural members was also used to predict and compare the bending strengths. In addition, the test strengths were compared with the theoretical elastic and plastic bending moments. It is shown that the design strengths predicted by the three specifications and the theoretical bending moments are generally conservative for the tested specimens. The reliability analysis was performed to evaluate the reliability of the design rules based on the existing resistance factors and load combination specified in the aforementioned specifications. It is shown that the American Specification and North American Specification are reliable for both normal and high strength specimens. The Australian/New Zealand Standard is reliable for normal strength specimens, but slightly unreliable for high strength specimens. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/twsen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofThin-Walled Structuresen_HK
dc.subjectBendingen_HK
dc.subjectCold-formed steelen_HK
dc.subjectDesign strengthen_HK
dc.subjectExperimental investigationen_HK
dc.subjectFlexural membersen_HK
dc.subjectSquare and rectangular hollow sectionsen_HK
dc.subjectStainless steelen_HK
dc.subjectTubular sectionsen_HK
dc.titleTests of cold-formed stainless steel tubular flexural membersen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0263-8231&volume=43&spage=1325&epage=1337&date=2005&atitle=Tests+of+Cold-formed+Stainless+Steel+Tubular+Flexural+Membersen_HK
dc.identifier.emailYoung, B:young@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYoung, B=rp00208en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tws.2005.06.005en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-23944480835en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros118217en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-23944480835&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume43en_HK
dc.identifier.issue9en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1325en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1337en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000231779300001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridZhou, F=36704235800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYoung, B=7402192398en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0263-8231-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats