File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/01446190701874405
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-40749086359
- WOS: WOS:000213242900007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Delineating the predominant criteria for subcontractor appraisal and their latent relationships
Title | Delineating the predominant criteria for subcontractor appraisal and their latent relationships |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Decision criteria Factor analysis Performance appraisal Subcontractor |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01446193.asp |
Citation | Construction Management And Economics, 2008, v. 26 n. 3, p. 249-259 How to Cite? |
Abstract | An industry report in Hong Kong calls for an agreed framework for appraising subcontractor performance. A set of performance appraisal criteria is developed that is agreeable to all key stakeholders in subcontracting. By examining the criteria being applied around the world and reviewing the available literature, a set of 31 subcontractor performance appraisal criteria was compiled. A questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong to reveal the perception of relevant stakeholders on the most critical criteria for subcontractor appraisal. The independent samples t-test confirmed that the main contractor and subcontractor groups had a significant agreement on the importance levels of most subcontractor performance appraisal criteria. Through factor analysis, the 15 most important subcontractor performance appraisal criteria and their underlying relationships are identified. The results indicate that the three overarching factors for subcontractor performance appraisal are 'team interaction', 'accomplishment of project goals' and 'track record'. The identified appraisal criteria lay a solid foundation for the development of a centralized subcontractor performance appraisal system to facilitate performance reporting, data sharing and benchmarking. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/70637 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.874 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, ST | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, Z | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T06:24:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T06:24:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Construction Management And Economics, 2008, v. 26 n. 3, p. 249-259 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-6193 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/70637 | - |
dc.description.abstract | An industry report in Hong Kong calls for an agreed framework for appraising subcontractor performance. A set of performance appraisal criteria is developed that is agreeable to all key stakeholders in subcontracting. By examining the criteria being applied around the world and reviewing the available literature, a set of 31 subcontractor performance appraisal criteria was compiled. A questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong to reveal the perception of relevant stakeholders on the most critical criteria for subcontractor appraisal. The independent samples t-test confirmed that the main contractor and subcontractor groups had a significant agreement on the importance levels of most subcontractor performance appraisal criteria. Through factor analysis, the 15 most important subcontractor performance appraisal criteria and their underlying relationships are identified. The results indicate that the three overarching factors for subcontractor performance appraisal are 'team interaction', 'accomplishment of project goals' and 'track record'. The identified appraisal criteria lay a solid foundation for the development of a centralized subcontractor performance appraisal system to facilitate performance reporting, data sharing and benchmarking. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01446193.asp | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Construction Management and Economics | en_HK |
dc.subject | Decision criteria | en_HK |
dc.subject | Factor analysis | en_HK |
dc.subject | Performance appraisal | en_HK |
dc.subject | Subcontractor | en_HK |
dc.title | Delineating the predominant criteria for subcontractor appraisal and their latent relationships | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0144-6193&volume=26&issue=3&spage=249&epage=259&date=2008&atitle=Delineating+the+predominant+criteria+for+subcontractor+appraisal+and+their+latent+relationships | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, ST:tstng@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, ST=rp00158 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01446190701874405 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-40749086359 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 142810 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-40749086359&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 249 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 259 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000213242900007 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, ST=7403358853 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, Z=36337418800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0144-6193 | - |