File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2004.tb00251.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-1342302784
- PMID: 15005472
- WOS: WOS:000227831300006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-Year results
Title | Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-Year results |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Atraumatic restorative treatment Glass ionomer cement Primary teeth |
Issue Date | 2004 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1875-595X |
Citation | International Dental Journal, 2004, v. 54 n. 1, p. 42-46 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To compare the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach with hand instruments, and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments. Method and Materials: Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs (Fuji IX GP, Ketac-Molar Aplicap) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy (GK-amalgam) was placed in 32 Class I preparations, in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 ± 1.24 (SD) years. Thus, 9 treatment groups were formed. Results: After two years, there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups (p = 0.99). However, two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals (p < 0.001). Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material. Conclusions: In a clinic setting, both the ART hand instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival, but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66876 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.803 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yu, C | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Gao, XJ | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Deng, DM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yip, HK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Smales, RJ | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T05:50:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T05:50:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | International Dental Journal, 2004, v. 54 n. 1, p. 42-46 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-6539 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66876 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach with hand instruments, and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments. Method and Materials: Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs (Fuji IX GP, Ketac-Molar Aplicap) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy (GK-amalgam) was placed in 32 Class I preparations, in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 ± 1.24 (SD) years. Thus, 9 treatment groups were formed. Results: After two years, there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups (p = 0.99). However, two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals (p < 0.001). Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material. Conclusions: In a clinic setting, both the ART hand instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival, but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1875-595X | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Dental Journal | en_HK |
dc.subject | Atraumatic restorative treatment | en_HK |
dc.subject | Glass ionomer cement | en_HK |
dc.subject | Primary teeth | en_HK |
dc.title | Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-Year results | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0020-6539&volume=54&spage=42&epage=46&date=2004&atitle=Survival+of+Glass+Ionomer+Restorations+Placed+in+Primary+Molars+Using+Atraumatic+Restorative+Treatment+(ART)+and+Conventional+Cavity+Preparations:+2-year+Results | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Yip, HK: kevin.h.k.yip@hkusua.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Yip, HK=rp00027 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2004.tb00251.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 15005472 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-1342302784 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 91469 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1342302784&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 54 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 42 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 46 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000227831300006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yu, C=8322333700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Gao, XJ=36848988500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Deng, DM=37118796800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yip, HK=25423244900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Smales, RJ=7005372382 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0020-6539 | - |