File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Spatial Disparities in Access to Public and Private Long-Term Care Facilities in Hong Kong

TitleSpatial Disparities in Access to Public and Private Long-Term Care Facilities in Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date12-Sep-2025
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
The Professional Geographer, 2025, v. 77, n. 5 How to Cite?
AbstractLong-term care facilities (LTCFs) provide institutional care for older adults, which improves their overall quality of life. Hong Kong, with a 20.5 percent aging rate in 2021, is now one of the world’s most rapidly aging cities. Few studies have systematically examined disparities in spatial accessibility between public and private LTCFs, particularly in high-density aging societies. This study addresses this research gap by evaluating spatial accessibility to LTCFs at the large subunit group level in Hong Kong and comparing service capacity across facility types. We applied spatial analysis and local regression methods to examine how accessibility correlates with socioeconomic characteristics. Our findings reveal that both public and private LTCFs cluster in traditionally developed urban areas, with private institutions dominating service provision. Regions with a higher concentration of low-income groups had lower access to LTCF resources, whereas regions with a higher concentration of single households had greater accessibility to LTCFs. Based on these findings, we recommend continued public LTCF subsidies and incentives for private-sector expansion into suburban areas. In conclusion, this research contributes to urban, human, and health geography by revealing the degree to which spatial inequality in LCTF access reflects broader patterns of social vulnerability and urban service provision.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369689
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.591

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Xinyi-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Yanjia-
dc.contributor.authorDeJohn, Amber-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-30T00:35:56Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-30T00:35:56Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-12-
dc.identifier.citationThe Professional Geographer, 2025, v. 77, n. 5-
dc.identifier.issn0033-0124-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369689-
dc.description.abstractLong-term care facilities (LTCFs) provide institutional care for older adults, which improves their overall quality of life. Hong Kong, with a 20.5 percent aging rate in 2021, is now one of the world’s most rapidly aging cities. Few studies have systematically examined disparities in spatial accessibility between public and private LTCFs, particularly in high-density aging societies. This study addresses this research gap by evaluating spatial accessibility to LTCFs at the large subunit group level in Hong Kong and comparing service capacity across facility types. We applied spatial analysis and local regression methods to examine how accessibility correlates with socioeconomic characteristics. Our findings reveal that both public and private LTCFs cluster in traditionally developed urban areas, with private institutions dominating service provision. Regions with a higher concentration of low-income groups had lower access to LTCF resources, whereas regions with a higher concentration of single households had greater accessibility to LTCFs. Based on these findings, we recommend continued public LTCF subsidies and incentives for private-sector expansion into suburban areas. In conclusion, this research contributes to urban, human, and health geography by revealing the degree to which spatial inequality in LCTF access reflects broader patterns of social vulnerability and urban service provision.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Professional Geographer-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleSpatial Disparities in Access to Public and Private Long-Term Care Facilities in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00330124.2025.2543540-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105016658143-
dc.identifier.volume77-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9272-
dc.identifier.issnl0033-0124-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats