File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The negative relationship between brain-age gap and psychological resilience defines the age-related neurocognitive status in older people

TitleThe negative relationship between brain-age gap and psychological resilience defines the age-related neurocognitive status in older people
Authors
KeywordsAgeing
Brain-age gap
Neurocognitive status
Resilience
Issue Date28-Jan-2025
PublisherSpringer
Citation
GeroScience, 2025, v. 47, n. 3, p. 4023-4040 How to Cite?
AbstractBiological brain age is a brain-predicted age using machine learning to indicate brain health and its associated conditions. The presence of an older predicted brain age relative to the actual chronological age is indicative of accelerated aging processes. Consequently, the disparity between the brain’s chronological age and its predicted age (brain-age gap) and the factors influencing this disparity provide critical insights into cerebral health dynamics during aging. In this study, we employed a Lasso regression model and analyzed multimodal imaging data from 124 participants aged 53 to 76 to formulate and predict brain age. Additionally, we conducted partial correlation analyses to explore the complex relationship between the brain-age gap and network metrics, cognitive assessments, and emotional evaluations, while controlling for chronological age, gender, and education. Our findings highlight psychological resilience as a significant mitigating factor against premature brain aging. It is established that psychological resilience significantly influences the modulation of the brain-age gap. Moreover, psychological resilience and the brain-age gap exhibit a high accuracy (above 0.72) in segregating Montreal Cognitive Assessment score–based cohorts. This observation underscores significant insight into the potential of utilizing the brain-age gap as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of accelerated aging. It advocates for the timely application of interventions, including the development of programs aimed at bolstering psychological resilience.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369445
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.468

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu, Yue-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Nichol M.L.-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Chetwyn C.H.-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jingsong-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tatia M.C.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-23T01:05:38Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-23T01:05:38Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-28-
dc.identifier.citationGeroScience, 2025, v. 47, n. 3, p. 4023-4040-
dc.identifier.issn2509-2715-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369445-
dc.description.abstractBiological brain age is a brain-predicted age using machine learning to indicate brain health and its associated conditions. The presence of an older predicted brain age relative to the actual chronological age is indicative of accelerated aging processes. Consequently, the disparity between the brain’s chronological age and its predicted age (brain-age gap) and the factors influencing this disparity provide critical insights into cerebral health dynamics during aging. In this study, we employed a Lasso regression model and analyzed multimodal imaging data from 124 participants aged 53 to 76 to formulate and predict brain age. Additionally, we conducted partial correlation analyses to explore the complex relationship between the brain-age gap and network metrics, cognitive assessments, and emotional evaluations, while controlling for chronological age, gender, and education. Our findings highlight psychological resilience as a significant mitigating factor against premature brain aging. It is established that psychological resilience significantly influences the modulation of the brain-age gap. Moreover, psychological resilience and the brain-age gap exhibit a high accuracy (above 0.72) in segregating Montreal Cognitive Assessment score–based cohorts. This observation underscores significant insight into the potential of utilizing the brain-age gap as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of accelerated aging. It advocates for the timely application of interventions, including the development of programs aimed at bolstering psychological resilience.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofGeroScience-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAgeing-
dc.subjectBrain-age gap-
dc.subjectNeurocognitive status-
dc.subjectResilience-
dc.titleThe negative relationship between brain-age gap and psychological resilience defines the age-related neurocognitive status in older people-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11357-025-01515-x-
dc.identifier.pmid39873921-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85217207412-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage4023-
dc.identifier.epage4040-
dc.identifier.eissn2509-2723-
dc.identifier.issnl2509-2723-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats