File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Environmental taxation and regional inequality in China

TitleEnvironmental taxation and regional inequality in China
Authors
KeywordsAir pollution
China
Environmental taxation
Inequality
Input-output analysis
Levy mechanisms
Issue Date2019
Citation
Science Bulletin, 2019, v. 64, n. 22, p. 1691-1699 How to Cite?
AbstractIn order to combat environmental pollution, China enacted the Environmental Protection Tax Law in early 2018. Yet the impacts of the environmental tax on individual regions with different socioeconomic statuses, which are crucial for social justice and public acceptance, remain unclear. Based on a Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) table and a nationally regulated tax payment calculation method, this study analyzes the distributional impacts of an environmental tax based upon province's consumption from both inter-provincial and rural-urban aspects. The national tax revenue based on the current levy mechanism is estimated to be only one seventh of the economic loss from premature mortality caused by ambient particulate matter (PM2.5). The taxation may slightly alleviate urban-rural inequality but may not be helpful with reducing inter-provincial inequality. We further analyze two alternative levy mechanisms. If each province imposes taxes to products it consumes (rather than produces, as in the current mechanism), with the tax rate linearly dependent on its per capita consumption expenditure, this would moderately increase the national tax revenue and significantly reduce inter-provincial inequality. To better compensate for the economic costs of air pollution and reduce regional inequality, it would be beneficial to increase the tax rate nationwide and implement a levy mechanism based on provincially differentiated levels of consumption and economic status.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369331
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 18.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.807

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jingxu-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jintai-
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Kuishuang-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorDu, Mingxi-
dc.contributor.authorNi, Ruijing-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Lulu-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Hao-
dc.contributor.authorWeng, Hongjian-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Mengyao-
dc.contributor.authorBaiocchi, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Yu-
dc.contributor.authorMi, Zhifu-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Jing-
dc.contributor.authorHubacek, Klaus-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-22T06:16:37Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-22T06:16:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationScience Bulletin, 2019, v. 64, n. 22, p. 1691-1699-
dc.identifier.issn2095-9273-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/369331-
dc.description.abstractIn order to combat environmental pollution, China enacted the Environmental Protection Tax Law in early 2018. Yet the impacts of the environmental tax on individual regions with different socioeconomic statuses, which are crucial for social justice and public acceptance, remain unclear. Based on a Multi-Regional Input-Output (MRIO) table and a nationally regulated tax payment calculation method, this study analyzes the distributional impacts of an environmental tax based upon province's consumption from both inter-provincial and rural-urban aspects. The national tax revenue based on the current levy mechanism is estimated to be only one seventh of the economic loss from premature mortality caused by ambient particulate matter (PM<inf>2.5</inf>). The taxation may slightly alleviate urban-rural inequality but may not be helpful with reducing inter-provincial inequality. We further analyze two alternative levy mechanisms. If each province imposes taxes to products it consumes (rather than produces, as in the current mechanism), with the tax rate linearly dependent on its per capita consumption expenditure, this would moderately increase the national tax revenue and significantly reduce inter-provincial inequality. To better compensate for the economic costs of air pollution and reduce regional inequality, it would be beneficial to increase the tax rate nationwide and implement a levy mechanism based on provincially differentiated levels of consumption and economic status.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofScience Bulletin-
dc.subjectAir pollution-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectEnvironmental taxation-
dc.subjectInequality-
dc.subjectInput-output analysis-
dc.subjectLevy mechanisms-
dc.titleEnvironmental taxation and regional inequality in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scib.2019.09.017-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85073835656-
dc.identifier.volume64-
dc.identifier.issue22-
dc.identifier.spage1691-
dc.identifier.epage1699-
dc.identifier.eissn2095-9281-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats