File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A systematic decision-making framework for selecting nitrous oxide quantification methods in water utilities

TitleA systematic decision-making framework for selecting nitrous oxide quantification methods in water utilities
Authors
KeywordsDecision-making
Gas-based method
Liquid-based method
N2O quantification
Issue Date2025
Citation
Water Research X, 2025, v. 28, article no. 100350 How to Cite?
AbstractWith the growing emphasis on reducing nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions in the wastewater treatment sector, an increasing number of water utilities are keen to quantify the actual N2O emissions from sewage treatment plants. Two main unit-based quantification methods are the liquid N2O sensor-based method and the gas flux hood-based method, both of which allow for real-time measurement at specific monitoring locations. Despite their widespread use, there is no clear, evidence-based framework to help utilities choose the most suitable method for their specific needs. This study addresses this gap by developing a systematic decision-making framework that considers the impact of key factors, including plant covering (fully covered or open surface), aeration type (diffused aeration or surface aerator), configurations (number of monitoring locations), monitoring duration, cost and technical difficulties etc. The framework incorporates a comprehensive multi-criteria evaluation to balance five essential criteria, including equipment cost, consumable cost, commissioning, maintenance and complexity in data analysis. Results indicate that the liquid-based method is more suitable for scenarios with fewer monitoring locations and shorter durations. In contrast, the gas-based method proves more advantageous in scenarios requiring high monitoring intensity. For intermediate-intensity scenarios, the likelihood of selecting gas-based method increases with monitoring intensity, with the decision being highly dependent on the weighting assigned to the factors. The findings also highlight the importance of determining the weights of criteria and scores based on specific operational needs, available resources, and technical capacity prior to multi-criteria evaluation process, which may vary the evaluation results accordingly. This framework provides utilities with a practical tool to optimize N2O monitoring strategies and support emission reduction.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368855

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shuting-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Kaili-
dc.contributor.authorAhmmed, Mohammad Shakil-
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Haoran-
dc.contributor.authorYe, Liu-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T02:38:27Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-16T02:38:27Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationWater Research X, 2025, v. 28, article no. 100350-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368855-
dc.description.abstractWith the growing emphasis on reducing nitrous oxide (N<inf>2</inf>O) emissions in the wastewater treatment sector, an increasing number of water utilities are keen to quantify the actual N<inf>2</inf>O emissions from sewage treatment plants. Two main unit-based quantification methods are the liquid N<inf>2</inf>O sensor-based method and the gas flux hood-based method, both of which allow for real-time measurement at specific monitoring locations. Despite their widespread use, there is no clear, evidence-based framework to help utilities choose the most suitable method for their specific needs. This study addresses this gap by developing a systematic decision-making framework that considers the impact of key factors, including plant covering (fully covered or open surface), aeration type (diffused aeration or surface aerator), configurations (number of monitoring locations), monitoring duration, cost and technical difficulties etc. The framework incorporates a comprehensive multi-criteria evaluation to balance five essential criteria, including equipment cost, consumable cost, commissioning, maintenance and complexity in data analysis. Results indicate that the liquid-based method is more suitable for scenarios with fewer monitoring locations and shorter durations. In contrast, the gas-based method proves more advantageous in scenarios requiring high monitoring intensity. For intermediate-intensity scenarios, the likelihood of selecting gas-based method increases with monitoring intensity, with the decision being highly dependent on the weighting assigned to the factors. The findings also highlight the importance of determining the weights of criteria and scores based on specific operational needs, available resources, and technical capacity prior to multi-criteria evaluation process, which may vary the evaluation results accordingly. This framework provides utilities with a practical tool to optimize N<inf>2</inf>O monitoring strategies and support emission reduction.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofWater Research X-
dc.subjectDecision-making-
dc.subjectGas-based method-
dc.subjectLiquid-based method-
dc.subjectN2O quantification-
dc.titleA systematic decision-making framework for selecting nitrous oxide quantification methods in water utilities-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.wroa.2025.100350-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105004877573-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 100350-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 100350-
dc.identifier.eissn2589-9147-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats