File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Does war moderate the association between mental wellbeing and its predictors among children? A multi-country cross-sectional study

TitleDoes war moderate the association between mental wellbeing and its predictors among children? A multi-country cross-sectional study
Authors
KeywordsChildren
Mental wellbeing
War or conflict experience
Issue Date2025
Citation
BMC Psychiatry, 2025, v. 25, n. 1, article no. 436 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: This study explores how war or conflict influences the established predictors of mental well-being among children, addressing a significant gap in current research. Methods: Utilizing data from Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS6) collected between 2016 and 2021, we examined children aged 5–17 years in four low or middle-low-income countries experiencing war or conflict and compared them to 20 control countries. We employed logistic models to analyze the data, focusing on mental well-being as the outcome. Primary independent variable was exposure to war, with an emphasis on the interaction between this exposure and potential predictors, including age, sex, having a physical disability, enrolled in education, having siblings, living with at least one parent, residence place, and family wealth status. Results: The analysis revealed significant modifications in the association between factors like age, disability, education, economic status, and place of residence and mental well-being due to war (p values < 0.05). Specifically, the impact of war was more pronounced in older children (OR = 1.48, 95%CI = 1.18–1.85) compared to younger ones. Education was found to mitigate anxiety in conflict-affected areas (OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.60–0.95), whereas children with disabilities were more vulnerable to mental health challenges (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.65–2.55) in these settings. Limitations: The mental well-being measure was based on caregiver reports, which may not fully capture the children’s experiences. Conclusion: Our findings provide crucial insights into the differential impact of war on children’s mental well-being. They underscore the need for tailored, context-specific mental health interventions for children in conflict-affected areas and encourage further research into the nuanced effects of war on child and adolescent mental health.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368852

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shanquan-
dc.contributor.authorRotenberg, Sara-
dc.contributor.authorKuper, Hannah-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T02:38:26Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-16T02:38:26Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry, 2025, v. 25, n. 1, article no. 436-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368852-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study explores how war or conflict influences the established predictors of mental well-being among children, addressing a significant gap in current research. Methods: Utilizing data from Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS6) collected between 2016 and 2021, we examined children aged 5–17 years in four low or middle-low-income countries experiencing war or conflict and compared them to 20 control countries. We employed logistic models to analyze the data, focusing on mental well-being as the outcome. Primary independent variable was exposure to war, with an emphasis on the interaction between this exposure and potential predictors, including age, sex, having a physical disability, enrolled in education, having siblings, living with at least one parent, residence place, and family wealth status. Results: The analysis revealed significant modifications in the association between factors like age, disability, education, economic status, and place of residence and mental well-being due to war (p values < 0.05). Specifically, the impact of war was more pronounced in older children (OR = 1.48, 95%CI = 1.18–1.85) compared to younger ones. Education was found to mitigate anxiety in conflict-affected areas (OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.60–0.95), whereas children with disabilities were more vulnerable to mental health challenges (OR = 2.05, 95%CI = 1.65–2.55) in these settings. Limitations: The mental well-being measure was based on caregiver reports, which may not fully capture the children’s experiences. Conclusion: Our findings provide crucial insights into the differential impact of war on children’s mental well-being. They underscore the need for tailored, context-specific mental health interventions for children in conflict-affected areas and encourage further research into the nuanced effects of war on child and adolescent mental health.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Psychiatry-
dc.subjectChildren-
dc.subjectMental wellbeing-
dc.subjectWar or conflict experience-
dc.titleDoes war moderate the association between mental wellbeing and its predictors among children? A multi-country cross-sectional study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-025-06795-3-
dc.identifier.pmid40301826-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105003805307-
dc.identifier.volume25-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 436-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 436-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-244X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats