File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Reducing sulfide and methane production in gravity sewer sediments through urine separation, collection and intermittent dosing

TitleReducing sulfide and methane production in gravity sewer sediments through urine separation, collection and intermittent dosing
Authors
KeywordsFA
Integrated wastewater management
Sewer system
Sulfide and methane
Urine
Issue Date2023
Citation
Water Research, 2023, v. 234, article no. 119820 How to Cite?
AbstractSulfide and methane production are a major concern in sewer management. Many solutions with the use of chemicals have been proposed yet incurring huge costs. Here, this study reports an alternative solution to reduce sulfide and methane production in sewer sediments. This is achieved through integration of urine source separation, rapid storage, and intermittent in situ re-dosing into a sewer. Based on a reasonable capacity of urine collection, an intermittent dosing strategy (i.e. 40 min per day) was designed and then experimentally tested using two laboratory sewer sediment reactors. The long-term operation showed that the proposed urine dosing in the experimental reactor effectively reduced sulfidogenic and methanogenic activities by 54% and 83%, compared to those in the control reactor. In-sediment chemical and microbial analyses revealed that the short-term exposure to urine wastewater was effective in suppressing sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea, particularly within a surface active zone of sediments (0–0.5 cm) likely attributed to the biocidal effect of urine free ammonia. Economic and environmental assessments indicated that the proposed urine approach can save 91% in total costs, 80% in energy consumption and 96% in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the conventional use of chemicals (including ferric salt, nitrate, sodium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide). These results collectively demonstrated a practical solution without chemical input to improve sewer management.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368727
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.596

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZuo, Zhiqiang-
dc.contributor.authorXing, Yaxin-
dc.contributor.authorDuan, Haoran-
dc.contributor.authorRen, Daheng-
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Min-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yanchen-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xia-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-16T02:37:48Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-16T02:37:48Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationWater Research, 2023, v. 234, article no. 119820-
dc.identifier.issn0043-1354-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368727-
dc.description.abstractSulfide and methane production are a major concern in sewer management. Many solutions with the use of chemicals have been proposed yet incurring huge costs. Here, this study reports an alternative solution to reduce sulfide and methane production in sewer sediments. This is achieved through integration of urine source separation, rapid storage, and intermittent in situ re-dosing into a sewer. Based on a reasonable capacity of urine collection, an intermittent dosing strategy (i.e. 40 min per day) was designed and then experimentally tested using two laboratory sewer sediment reactors. The long-term operation showed that the proposed urine dosing in the experimental reactor effectively reduced sulfidogenic and methanogenic activities by 54% and 83%, compared to those in the control reactor. In-sediment chemical and microbial analyses revealed that the short-term exposure to urine wastewater was effective in suppressing sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic archaea, particularly within a surface active zone of sediments (0–0.5 cm) likely attributed to the biocidal effect of urine free ammonia. Economic and environmental assessments indicated that the proposed urine approach can save 91% in total costs, 80% in energy consumption and 96% in greenhouse gas emissions compared to the conventional use of chemicals (including ferric salt, nitrate, sodium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide). These results collectively demonstrated a practical solution without chemical input to improve sewer management.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofWater Research-
dc.subjectFA-
dc.subjectIntegrated wastewater management-
dc.subjectSewer system-
dc.subjectSulfide and methane-
dc.subjectUrine-
dc.titleReducing sulfide and methane production in gravity sewer sediments through urine separation, collection and intermittent dosing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.watres.2023.119820-
dc.identifier.pmid36889087-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85149483048-
dc.identifier.volume234-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 119820-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 119820-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-2448-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats