File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Hong Kong in Venice: Can the ‘Archival Impulse’ Be Projective? Can the Tectonics of the ‘Tradition’ be Modern?

TitleHong Kong in Venice: Can the ‘Archival Impulse’ Be Projective? Can the Tectonics of the ‘Tradition’ be Modern?
Authors
Issue Date29-Dec-2025
PublisherOpen Library of Humanities
Citation
Architectural Histories, 2025, v. 13, n. 1, p. 34-38 How to Cite?
Abstract

This set of Field Notes charts research presented at the Venice Biennale of Architecture through the voices of some of those who contributed directly to its 19th edition in 2025. The editors of Architectural Histories invited seven contributors to national pavilions deemed particularly relevant (Switzerland, Peru, Ukraine, Australia, Austria, Italy, Hong Kong) and one contributor to the main exhibition (Kate Crawford) to expand upon the research underpinning their exhibits, offering them space to publish their thinking in a journal of record. Framed by an introduction from  three of the journal's editors along with critical notes by Léa-Catherine Szacka and Philip Ursprung, the set of Field Notes illuminates the role of historical research in the Biennale, and the role of such biennale(s) for research in the field of architecture. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368497
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.234

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Ying-
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-09T00:35:20Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-09T00:35:20Z-
dc.date.issued2025-12-29-
dc.identifier.citationArchitectural Histories, 2025, v. 13, n. 1, p. 34-38-
dc.identifier.issn2050-5833-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368497-
dc.description.abstract<p>This set of Field Notes charts research presented at the Venice Biennale of Architecture through the voices of some of those who contributed directly to its 19th edition in 2025. The editors of <em>Architectural Histories</em> invited seven contributors to national pavilions deemed particularly relevant (Switzerland, Peru, Ukraine, Australia, Austria, Italy, Hong Kong) and one contributor to the main exhibition (Kate Crawford) to expand upon the research underpinning their exhibits, offering them space to publish their thinking in a journal of record. Framed by an introduction from  three of the journal's editors along with critical notes by Léa-Catherine Szacka and Philip Ursprung, the set of Field Notes illuminates the role of historical research in the Biennale, and the role of such biennale(s) for research in the field of architecture. <br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOpen Library of Humanities-
dc.relation.ispartofArchitectural Histories-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleHong Kong in Venice: Can the ‘Archival Impulse’ Be Projective? Can the Tectonics of the ‘Tradition’ be Modern?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.16995/ah.25004-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage34-
dc.identifier.epage38-
dc.identifier.eissn2050-5833-
dc.identifier.issnl2050-5833-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats