File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Hong Kong in Venice: Can the ‘Archival Impulse’ Be Projective? Can the Tectonics of the ‘Tradition’ be Modern?
| Title | Hong Kong in Venice: Can the ‘Archival Impulse’ Be Projective? Can the Tectonics of the ‘Tradition’ be Modern? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 29-Dec-2025 |
| Publisher | Open Library of Humanities |
| Citation | Architectural Histories, 2025, v. 13, n. 1, p. 34-38 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This set of Field Notes charts research presented at the Venice Biennale of Architecture through the voices of some of those who contributed directly to its 19th edition in 2025. The editors of Architectural Histories invited seven contributors to national pavilions deemed particularly relevant (Switzerland, Peru, Ukraine, Australia, Austria, Italy, Hong Kong) and one contributor to the main exhibition (Kate Crawford) to expand upon the research underpinning their exhibits, offering them space to publish their thinking in a journal of record. Framed by an introduction from three of the journal's editors along with critical notes by Léa-Catherine Szacka and Philip Ursprung, the set of Field Notes illuminates the role of historical research in the Biennale, and the role of such biennale(s) for research in the field of architecture. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/368497 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.234 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Ying | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-09T00:35:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-09T00:35:20Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-29 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Architectural Histories, 2025, v. 13, n. 1, p. 34-38 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2050-5833 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/368497 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <p>This set of Field Notes charts research presented at the Venice Biennale of Architecture through the voices of some of those who contributed directly to its 19th edition in 2025. The editors of <em>Architectural Histories</em> invited seven contributors to national pavilions deemed particularly relevant (Switzerland, Peru, Ukraine, Australia, Austria, Italy, Hong Kong) and one contributor to the main exhibition (Kate Crawford) to expand upon the research underpinning their exhibits, offering them space to publish their thinking in a journal of record. Framed by an introduction from three of the journal's editors along with critical notes by Léa-Catherine Szacka and Philip Ursprung, the set of Field Notes illuminates the role of historical research in the Biennale, and the role of such biennale(s) for research in the field of architecture. <br></p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Open Library of Humanities | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Architectural Histories | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.title | Hong Kong in Venice: Can the ‘Archival Impulse’ Be Projective? Can the Tectonics of the ‘Tradition’ be Modern? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.16995/ah.25004 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 34 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 38 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2050-5833 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 2050-5833 | - |

