File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Auctioning Control and Cash-Flow Rights Separately

TitleAuctioning Control and Cash-Flow Rights Separately
Authors
KeywordsControl and cash flow rights
interdependent valuations
mechanism design
separation of rights
Issue Date1-May-2025
PublisherEconometric Society
Citation
Econometrica, 2025, v. 93, n. 3, p. 859-889 How to Cite?
AbstractWe consider a classical auction setting in which an asset/project is sold to buyers who privately receive signals about expected payoffs, and payoffs are more sensitive to a bidder's signal if he runs the project than if another bidder does. We show that a seller can increase revenues by sometimes allocating cash-flow rights and control to different bidders, for example, with the highest bidder receiving cash flows and the second-highest receiving control. Separation reduces a bidder's information rent, which depends on the importance of his private information for the value of his awarded cash flows. As project payoffs are most sensitive to a bidder's information if he controls the project, allocating cash flow to another bidder lowers bidders' informational advantage. As a result, when signals are close, the seller can increase revenues by splitting rights between the top two bidders.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368206
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 17.701

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Tingjun-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Dan-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-24T00:36:50Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-24T00:36:50Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationEconometrica, 2025, v. 93, n. 3, p. 859-889-
dc.identifier.issn0012-9682-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368206-
dc.description.abstractWe consider a classical auction setting in which an asset/project is sold to buyers who privately receive signals about expected payoffs, and payoffs are more sensitive to a bidder's signal if he runs the project than if another bidder does. We show that a seller can increase revenues by sometimes allocating cash-flow rights and control to different bidders, for example, with the highest bidder receiving cash flows and the second-highest receiving control. Separation reduces a bidder's information rent, which depends on the importance of his private information for the value of his awarded cash flows. As project payoffs are most sensitive to a bidder's information if he controls the project, allocating cash flow to another bidder lowers bidders' informational advantage. As a result, when signals are close, the seller can increase revenues by splitting rights between the top two bidders.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEconometric Society-
dc.relation.ispartofEconometrica-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectControl and cash flow rights-
dc.subjectinterdependent valuations-
dc.subjectmechanism design-
dc.subjectseparation of rights-
dc.titleAuctioning Control and Cash-Flow Rights Separately-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3982/ECTA21343-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105007648006-
dc.identifier.volume93-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage859-
dc.identifier.epage889-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0262-
dc.identifier.issnl0012-9682-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats