File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The magnitude of legal wildlife trade and implications for species survival

TitleThe magnitude of legal wildlife trade and implications for species survival
Authors
Keywordsbiodiversity
extinction
sustainability
trade
unsustainable
Issue Date14-Jan-2025
PublisherNational Academy of Sciences
Citation
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., 2025, v. 122, n. 2 How to Cite?
AbstractThe unsustainable use of wildlife is a primary driver of global biodiversity loss. No comprehensive global dataset exists on what species are in trade, their geographic origins, and trade’s ultimate impacts, which limits our ability to sustainably manage trade. The United States is one of the world’s largest importers of wildlife, with trade data compiled in the US Law Enforcement Management Information System (LEMIS). The LEMIS provides the most comprehensive publicly accessible wildlife trade database of non-the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) listed species. In total, 21,097 species and over 2.85 billion individuals were traded over the past 22 y (2000-2022). When LEMIS data are combined with CITES records, the United States imported over 29,445 wild species, including over 50% of all globally described species in some taxonomic groups. For most taxa, around half of the individuals are declared as sourced from the wild. Although the LEMIS provides the only means to assess trade volumes for many taxa, without any associated data on most wild populations, it is impossible to assess the impact on biodiversity, sustainability of trade, or any potential risk of pest or pathogen spread. These insights underscore the considerable underestimation of trade and the urgent need for other countries to adopt similar mechanisms to accurately record trade.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368151
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.737

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Benjamin Michael-
dc.contributor.authorAlamshah, Aubrey L.-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorCassey, Phillip-
dc.contributor.authorChekunov, Sebastian-
dc.contributor.authorEskew, Evan A.-
dc.contributor.authorFukushima, Caroline S.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Díaz, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorGore, Meredith L.-
dc.contributor.authorLockwood, Julie L.-
dc.contributor.authorRhyne, Andrew L.-
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, James S.-
dc.contributor.authorStrine, Colin Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorStringham, Oliver C.-
dc.contributor.authorTlusty, Michael F.-
dc.contributor.authorValdez, Jose W.-
dc.contributor.authorWatters, Freyja-
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Alice C.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-24T00:36:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-24T00:36:32Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-14-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America., 2025, v. 122, n. 2-
dc.identifier.issn1091-6490-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/368151-
dc.description.abstractThe unsustainable use of wildlife is a primary driver of global biodiversity loss. No comprehensive global dataset exists on what species are in trade, their geographic origins, and trade’s ultimate impacts, which limits our ability to sustainably manage trade. The United States is one of the world’s largest importers of wildlife, with trade data compiled in the US Law Enforcement Management Information System (LEMIS). The LEMIS provides the most comprehensive publicly accessible wildlife trade database of non-the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) listed species. In total, 21,097 species and over 2.85 billion individuals were traded over the past 22 y (2000-2022). When LEMIS data are combined with CITES records, the United States imported over 29,445 wild species, including over 50% of all globally described species in some taxonomic groups. For most taxa, around half of the individuals are declared as sourced from the wild. Although the LEMIS provides the only means to assess trade volumes for many taxa, without any associated data on most wild populations, it is impossible to assess the impact on biodiversity, sustainability of trade, or any potential risk of pest or pathogen spread. These insights underscore the considerable underestimation of trade and the urgent need for other countries to adopt similar mechanisms to accurately record trade.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbiodiversity-
dc.subjectextinction-
dc.subjectsustainability-
dc.subjecttrade-
dc.subjectunsustainable-
dc.titleThe magnitude of legal wildlife trade and implications for species survival-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.2410774121-
dc.identifier.pmid39772741-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85214973310-
dc.identifier.volume122-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.eissn0027-8424-
dc.identifier.issnl0027-8424-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats