File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1038/s41598-021-87735-5
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85104404628
- PMID: 33863942
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: An ERP study on proactive and reactive response inhibition in individuals with schizotypy
| Title | An ERP study on proactive and reactive response inhibition in individuals with schizotypy |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 2021 |
| Citation | Scientific Reports, 2021, v. 11, n. 1, article no. 8394 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Schizotypy, a subclinical group at risk for schizophrenia, has been found to show impairments in response inhibition. However, it remains unclear whether this impairment is accompanied by outright stopping (reactive inhibition) or preparation for stopping (proactive inhibition). We recruited 20 schizotypy and 24 non-schizotypy individuals to perform a modified stop-signal task with electroencephalographic (EEG) data recorded. This task consists of three conditions based on the probability of stop signal: 0% (no stop trials, only go trials), 17% (17% stop trials), and 33% (33% stop trials), the conditions were indicated by the colour of go stimuli. For proactive inhibition (go trials), individuals with schizotypy exhibited significantly lesser increase in go response time (RT) as the stop signal probability increasing compared to non-schizotypy individuals. Individuals with schizotypy also exhibited significantly increased N1 amplitude on all levels of stop signal probability and increased P3 amplitude in the 17% stop condition compared with non-schizotypy individuals. For reactive inhibition (stop trials), individuals with schizotypy exhibited significantly longer stop signal reaction time (SSRT) in both 17% and 33% stop conditions and smaller N2 amplitude on stop trials in the 17% stop condition than non-schizotypy individuals. These findings suggest that individuals with schizotypy were impaired in both proactive and reactive response inhibition at behavioural and neural levels. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/368049 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Jia, Lu xia | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Qin, Xiao jing | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cui, Ji fang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zheng, Qi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yang, Tian xiao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Ya | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, Raymond C.K. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-19T08:01:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-19T08:01:30Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Scientific Reports, 2021, v. 11, n. 1, article no. 8394 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/368049 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Schizotypy, a subclinical group at risk for schizophrenia, has been found to show impairments in response inhibition. However, it remains unclear whether this impairment is accompanied by outright stopping (reactive inhibition) or preparation for stopping (proactive inhibition). We recruited 20 schizotypy and 24 non-schizotypy individuals to perform a modified stop-signal task with electroencephalographic (EEG) data recorded. This task consists of three conditions based on the probability of stop signal: 0% (no stop trials, only go trials), 17% (17% stop trials), and 33% (33% stop trials), the conditions were indicated by the colour of go stimuli. For proactive inhibition (go trials), individuals with schizotypy exhibited significantly lesser increase in go response time (RT) as the stop signal probability increasing compared to non-schizotypy individuals. Individuals with schizotypy also exhibited significantly increased N1 amplitude on all levels of stop signal probability and increased P3 amplitude in the 17% stop condition compared with non-schizotypy individuals. For reactive inhibition (stop trials), individuals with schizotypy exhibited significantly longer stop signal reaction time (SSRT) in both 17% and 33% stop conditions and smaller N2 amplitude on stop trials in the 17% stop condition than non-schizotypy individuals. These findings suggest that individuals with schizotypy were impaired in both proactive and reactive response inhibition at behavioural and neural levels. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Scientific Reports | - |
| dc.title | An ERP study on proactive and reactive response inhibition in individuals with schizotypy | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41598-021-87735-5 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 33863942 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85104404628 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 11 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | article no. 8394 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | article no. 8394 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2045-2322 | - |
