File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Resting-state functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression

TitleResting-state functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression
Authors
Issue Date2011
Citation
American Journal of Psychiatry, 2011, v. 168, n. 6, p. 642-648 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: The authors used restingstate functional connectivity MRI to evaluate brain networks in patients with refractory and nonrefractory major depressive disorder. Method: In a cross-sectional study, 28 patients with refractory major depression, 32 patients with nonrefractory major depression, and 48 healthy comparison subjects underwent scanning using a gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence on a 3-T MR system. Thirteen regions of interest that have been identified in the literature as relevant to mood regulation were selected as seed areas. A reference time series was extracted for each seed and used for voxel-wise correlation analysis with the rest of the brain. Voxel-based comparisons of z-value maps among the three groups were performed using oneway analysis of variance followed by post hoc t tests with age and duration of illness as covariates of no interest. Results: Relative to healthy comparison subjects, both patient groups showed significantly reduced connectivity in prefrontal-limbic-thalamic areas bilaterally. However, the nonrefractory group showed a more distributed decrease in connectivity than the refractory group, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex and in the amygdala, hippocampus, and insula bilaterally; in contrast, the refractory group showed disrupted functional connectivity mainly in prefrontal areas and in thalamus areas bilaterally. Conclusions: Refractory depression is associated with disrupted functional connectivity mainly in thalamo-cortical circuits, while nonrefractory depression is associated with more distributed decreased connectivity in the limbic-striatal-pallidal-thalamic circuit. These results suggest that nonrefractory and refractory depression are characterized by distinct functional deficits in distributed brain networks.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367913
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 15.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.321

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLui, Su-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Qizhu-
dc.contributor.authorQiu, Lihua-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Xun-
dc.contributor.authorKuang, Weihong-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Raymond C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xiaoqi-
dc.contributor.authorKemp, Graham J.-
dc.contributor.authorMechelli, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorGong, Qiyong-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T08:00:19Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-19T08:00:19Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2011, v. 168, n. 6, p. 642-648-
dc.identifier.issn0002-953X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367913-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The authors used restingstate functional connectivity MRI to evaluate brain networks in patients with refractory and nonrefractory major depressive disorder. Method: In a cross-sectional study, 28 patients with refractory major depression, 32 patients with nonrefractory major depression, and 48 healthy comparison subjects underwent scanning using a gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence on a 3-T MR system. Thirteen regions of interest that have been identified in the literature as relevant to mood regulation were selected as seed areas. A reference time series was extracted for each seed and used for voxel-wise correlation analysis with the rest of the brain. Voxel-based comparisons of z-value maps among the three groups were performed using oneway analysis of variance followed by post hoc t tests with age and duration of illness as covariates of no interest. Results: Relative to healthy comparison subjects, both patient groups showed significantly reduced connectivity in prefrontal-limbic-thalamic areas bilaterally. However, the nonrefractory group showed a more distributed decrease in connectivity than the refractory group, especially in the anterior cingulate cortex and in the amygdala, hippocampus, and insula bilaterally; in contrast, the refractory group showed disrupted functional connectivity mainly in prefrontal areas and in thalamus areas bilaterally. Conclusions: Refractory depression is associated with disrupted functional connectivity mainly in thalamo-cortical circuits, while nonrefractory depression is associated with more distributed decreased connectivity in the limbic-striatal-pallidal-thalamic circuit. These results suggest that nonrefractory and refractory depression are characterized by distinct functional deficits in distributed brain networks.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Psychiatry-
dc.titleResting-state functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10101419-
dc.identifier.pmid21362744-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79960549391-
dc.identifier.volume168-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage642-
dc.identifier.epage648-
dc.identifier.eissn1535-7228-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats