File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A cross-cultural examination of the experiences in close relationships — Revised — General short form (ECR-R-GSF) in an Australian and a Chinese sample

TitleA cross-cultural examination of the experiences in close relationships — Revised — General short form (ECR-R-GSF) in an Australian and a Chinese sample
Authors
KeywordsAttachment anxiety
Attachment avoidance
Chinese
Cross-cultural
Experience in Close Relationship — Revised (ECR-R)
Factorial structure
Measurement invariance
Short form
Issue Date2019
Citation
Journal of Relationships Research, 2019, v. 10, article no. e11 How to Cite?
AbstractAttachment dimensions refer to how interpersonal emotion regulation strategies are utilised and have a profound impact in adulthood. Its measurement has attracted a large amount of research attention. The Experiences in Close Relationships — Revised (ECR-R) Questionnaire is one of the most widely used and researched self-report questionnaires to measure romantic attachment anxiety and avoidance in multiple language groups, despite inconsistent evidence regarding its factorial structure. The 20-item Experiences in Close Relationships — Revised — General Short Form (ECR-R-GSF) was developed based on the ECR-R to measure attachment experiences in all relationships (not just romantic ones) in an English-speaking sample. However, no short form of the ECR-R is available for the Chinese population. In order to cross-validate the first Chinese version of the ECR-R-GSF, specifically the proposed two-factor structure, against the English version, an Australian university student sample (n = 426) and a Chinese university student sample from China (n = 626) were recruited. The Anxiety and Avoidance scales were found to have good internal reliability in both samples. However, the proposed two-factor model only provided an acceptable fit even after adding modifications in the Australian sample, and the fit was not satisfactory in the Chinese sample. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that partial metric but not scalar invariance was achieved across cultures. Implications for relationship and cross-cultural research and practice were discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367817

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHao, Jichun-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Raymond C.K.-
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Ross B.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T07:59:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-19T07:59:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Relationships Research, 2019, v. 10, article no. e11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/367817-
dc.description.abstractAttachment dimensions refer to how interpersonal emotion regulation strategies are utilised and have a profound impact in adulthood. Its measurement has attracted a large amount of research attention. The Experiences in Close Relationships — Revised (ECR-R) Questionnaire is one of the most widely used and researched self-report questionnaires to measure romantic attachment anxiety and avoidance in multiple language groups, despite inconsistent evidence regarding its factorial structure. The 20-item Experiences in Close Relationships — Revised — General Short Form (ECR-R-GSF) was developed based on the ECR-R to measure attachment experiences in all relationships (not just romantic ones) in an English-speaking sample. However, no short form of the ECR-R is available for the Chinese population. In order to cross-validate the first Chinese version of the ECR-R-GSF, specifically the proposed two-factor structure, against the English version, an Australian university student sample (n = 426) and a Chinese university student sample from China (n = 626) were recruited. The Anxiety and Avoidance scales were found to have good internal reliability in both samples. However, the proposed two-factor model only provided an acceptable fit even after adding modifications in the Australian sample, and the fit was not satisfactory in the Chinese sample. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that partial metric but not scalar invariance was achieved across cultures. Implications for relationship and cross-cultural research and practice were discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Relationships Research-
dc.subjectAttachment anxiety-
dc.subjectAttachment avoidance-
dc.subjectChinese-
dc.subjectCross-cultural-
dc.subjectExperience in Close Relationship — Revised (ECR-R)-
dc.subjectFactorial structure-
dc.subjectMeasurement invariance-
dc.subjectShort form-
dc.titleA cross-cultural examination of the experiences in close relationships — Revised — General short form (ECR-R-GSF) in an Australian and a Chinese sample-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/jrr.2019.8-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85068210552-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e11-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e11-
dc.identifier.eissn1838-0956-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats