File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.12932/ap-270524-1864
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105020806739
- PMID: 39306735
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Evaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis
| Title | Evaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | allergy cost-effectiveness COVID-19 hesitancy safety vaccine |
| Issue Date | 1-Sep-2025 |
| Publisher | Allergy and Immunology Society of Thailand |
| Citation | Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 2025, v. 43, n. 3, p. 560-568 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Background: Concerns about new COVID-19 vaccines played a key role in vaccine hesitancy and hampered population uptake. Hong Kong initiated a Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model of predominately non-specialists supported by the allergist hub was established to meet overwhelming demand despite limited specialists. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of VAS-Track as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for individuals potentially at high risk of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergy. Methods: An individual-level decision-analytical model was constructed using data from VAS-Track participants supplemented by published estimates. Analyses were from a health service provider perspective over 12 months. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Willingness-to-pay threshold was based on local GDP per capita (US$ 49,590). Sensitivity analyses examined robustness of findings. Results: Cost-effectiveness varied widely across age groups. VAS-Track was cost-saving for older adults (dominant strategy for age ≥ 50) compared with standard practice across a range of sensitivity analyses. VAS-Track was not cost-effective for younger groups (age 18-49: ICER: US$ 410,914/QALY for pre-vaccination and US$ 213,786/QALY for post-vaccination assessments). Infection rate, cost of treating severe infection, and vaccination rate were most influential on cost-effectiveness estimates. Conclusions: VAS-Track was cost-effective both as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for adults over 50. The ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model using non-specialists with limited allergy specialist resources to provide vaccine allergy assessment services would provide high economic value compared with usual care for adults aged 50 and over. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/367064 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.605 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Xiong, Xuechen | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Huo, Zhaohua | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chiang, Valerie | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ye, Jiaxi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hong, Yuh Dong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi, Xingnan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ng, Carmen S. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Philip H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Quan, Jianchao | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-02T00:35:32Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-02T00:35:32Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-09-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 2025, v. 43, n. 3, p. 560-568 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0125-877X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/367064 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Concerns about new COVID-19 vaccines played a key role in vaccine hesitancy and hampered population uptake. Hong Kong initiated a Vaccine Allergy Safety Track (VAS-Track) program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergies. A ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model of predominately non-specialists supported by the allergist hub was established to meet overwhelming demand despite limited specialists. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of VAS-Track as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for individuals potentially at high risk of COVID-19 vaccine-related allergy. Methods: An individual-level decision-analytical model was constructed using data from VAS-Track participants supplemented by published estimates. Analyses were from a health service provider perspective over 12 months. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Willingness-to-pay threshold was based on local GDP per capita (US$ 49,590). Sensitivity analyses examined robustness of findings. Results: Cost-effectiveness varied widely across age groups. VAS-Track was cost-saving for older adults (dominant strategy for age ≥ 50) compared with standard practice across a range of sensitivity analyses. VAS-Track was not cost-effective for younger groups (age 18-49: ICER: US$ 410,914/QALY for pre-vaccination and US$ 213,786/QALY for post-vaccination assessments). Infection rate, cost of treating severe infection, and vaccination rate were most influential on cost-effectiveness estimates. Conclusions: VAS-Track was cost-effective both as a pre-and post-vaccination assessment service for adults over 50. The ‘Hub-and-Spoke’ model using non-specialists with limited allergy specialist resources to provide vaccine allergy assessment services would provide high economic value compared with usual care for adults aged 50 and over. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Allergy and Immunology Society of Thailand | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | allergy | - |
| dc.subject | cost-effectiveness | - |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | - |
| dc.subject | hesitancy | - |
| dc.subject | safety | - |
| dc.subject | vaccine | - |
| dc.title | Evaluation of vaccine allergy safety track program to assess potential COVID-19 vaccine allergy: a cost-effectiveness analysis | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.12932/ap-270524-1864 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 39306735 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105020806739 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 560 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 568 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 0125-877X | - |
