File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Threat to Family Stability or Social Stability? Domestic Violence Protection Orders in Two Chinese Courts

TitleThreat to Family Stability or Social Stability? Domestic Violence Protection Orders in Two Chinese Courts
Authors
Issue Date1-May-2025
PublisherCambridge University Press
Citation
Law and Social Inquiry, 2025, v. 50, n. 2, p. 378-405 How to Cite?
AbstractIn this examination of domestic violence protection orders in two lower-level Chinese courts, the interpretation of gender violence with respect to political concerns for social stability plays an essential role in the law's effectiveness. In an urbanized coastal area court, judges see gender violence as a direct threat to social stability. To maintain stability, they facilitate claims against gender violence. Conversely, in a rural court, judges view gender violence as a direct threat to family stability. To maintain family stability, which is closely linked to social stability, they suppress claims against gender violence. This study proposes that, when global discourses are reformulated, new forms of cultural and political appropriation emerge. It highlights the complexities that arise when law, culture, and politics intermingle in the process of law and globalization. Understanding these complexities is crucial for addressing challenges in implementing global legal reforms at the local level and ensuring protection against gender violence.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366987
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.534

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xin-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-29T00:35:45Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-29T00:35:45Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationLaw and Social Inquiry, 2025, v. 50, n. 2, p. 378-405-
dc.identifier.issn0897-6546-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366987-
dc.description.abstractIn this examination of domestic violence protection orders in two lower-level Chinese courts, the interpretation of gender violence with respect to political concerns for social stability plays an essential role in the law's effectiveness. In an urbanized coastal area court, judges see gender violence as a direct threat to social stability. To maintain stability, they facilitate claims against gender violence. Conversely, in a rural court, judges view gender violence as a direct threat to family stability. To maintain family stability, which is closely linked to social stability, they suppress claims against gender violence. This study proposes that, when global discourses are reformulated, new forms of cultural and political appropriation emerge. It highlights the complexities that arise when law, culture, and politics intermingle in the process of law and globalization. Understanding these complexities is crucial for addressing challenges in implementing global legal reforms at the local level and ensuring protection against gender violence.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCambridge University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofLaw and Social Inquiry-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleThreat to Family Stability or Social Stability? Domestic Violence Protection Orders in Two Chinese Courts-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/lsi.2025.6-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85218802738-
dc.identifier.volume50-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage378-
dc.identifier.epage405-
dc.identifier.eissn1747-4469-
dc.identifier.issnl0897-6546-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats