File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An Approach to Improve Specimen Processing for the Flexural Strength Testing of Zirconia

TitleAn Approach to Improve Specimen Processing for the Flexural Strength Testing of Zirconia
Authors
Keywords3Y-TZP
biaxial flexural strength
surface treatment
three-point bending test
zirconia
Issue Date14-Jul-2024
PublisherMDPI
Citation
Materials, 2024, v. 17, n. 14 How to Cite?
AbstractMeasuring the flexural strength of restorative materials such as zirconia is crucial for providing proper indications for clinical applications and predicting performance. Great variations in specimen preparation for flexural strength measurements exist among laboratories. The aim was to evaluate how the processing method, surface treatment, and test method of the specimens affect the flexural strength of zirconia. Zirconia specimens (VITA YZ HT) (n = 270) were processed using CAD/CAM or were conventionally milled with three different surface treatments (machined, ground, polished) and were measured with three-point bending (non-chamfered/chamfered) or biaxial flexural strength test. Weibull statistics were conducted. The mean flexural strength values ranged from 612 MPa (conventional, machined, three-point bending non-chamfered) to 1143 MPa (CAD/CAM, polished, biaxial flexural strength). The highest reliability is achieved when specimens are prepared using thoroughly controllable processing with CAD/CAM and subsequently polished. Higher strength values are achieved with the biaxial flexural strength test method because the stress concentration in relation to the effective volume is smaller. Polishing reduces surface microcracks and therefore increases the strength values.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366974
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.565

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Nashib-
dc.contributor.authorKarlin, Sabrina-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, Michael Marc-
dc.contributor.authorRohr, Nadja-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-29T00:35:37Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-29T00:35:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-14-
dc.identifier.citationMaterials, 2024, v. 17, n. 14-
dc.identifier.issn1996-1944-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366974-
dc.description.abstractMeasuring the flexural strength of restorative materials such as zirconia is crucial for providing proper indications for clinical applications and predicting performance. Great variations in specimen preparation for flexural strength measurements exist among laboratories. The aim was to evaluate how the processing method, surface treatment, and test method of the specimens affect the flexural strength of zirconia. Zirconia specimens (VITA YZ HT) (n = 270) were processed using CAD/CAM or were conventionally milled with three different surface treatments (machined, ground, polished) and were measured with three-point bending (non-chamfered/chamfered) or biaxial flexural strength test. Weibull statistics were conducted. The mean flexural strength values ranged from 612 MPa (conventional, machined, three-point bending non-chamfered) to 1143 MPa (CAD/CAM, polished, biaxial flexural strength). The highest reliability is achieved when specimens are prepared using thoroughly controllable processing with CAD/CAM and subsequently polished. Higher strength values are achieved with the biaxial flexural strength test method because the stress concentration in relation to the effective volume is smaller. Polishing reduces surface microcracks and therefore increases the strength values.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subject3Y-TZP-
dc.subjectbiaxial flexural strength-
dc.subjectsurface treatment-
dc.subjectthree-point bending test-
dc.subjectzirconia-
dc.titleAn Approach to Improve Specimen Processing for the Flexural Strength Testing of Zirconia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ma17143479-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85199799973-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.issue14-
dc.identifier.issnl1996-1944-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats