File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Against Digital Superstition: On the Pseudoscientific Development of the Sociology of Law in China

TitleAgainst Digital Superstition: On the Pseudoscientific Development of the Sociology of Law in China
Authors
Keywordsdigital superstition
digitalization
methodology
sociology of law
technology
Issue Date1-Jan-2025
PublisherBrill
Citation
China law and society review, 2025, v. 10, n. 1, p. 51-73 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article examines the current state of the sociology of law in China, which is characterized by pervasive digital superstition and a “scientific turn” towards quantitative methods. The article traces the historical development of the field, critically assesses the impact of digital technologies on sociolegal research, and scrutinizes the underlying causes of digital superstition, including academic incentives, technological advancements, and state control over data. In response to these issues, the article proposes alternative approaches to conducting sociolegal research in the era of digitalization, such as video observation and online ethnography, highlighting the significance of storytelling. The article advocates for a balanced and reflective approach to digitalization in Chinese sociology of law, emphasizing the potential for meaningful advancements in the field when digital technologies are employed judiciously and responsibly.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366836
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Sida-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-26T02:50:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-26T02:50:26Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationChina law and society review, 2025, v. 10, n. 1, p. 51-73-
dc.identifier.issn2542-7458-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366836-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the current state of the sociology of law in China, which is characterized by pervasive digital superstition and a “scientific turn” towards quantitative methods. The article traces the historical development of the field, critically assesses the impact of digital technologies on sociolegal research, and scrutinizes the underlying causes of digital superstition, including academic incentives, technological advancements, and state control over data. In response to these issues, the article proposes alternative approaches to conducting sociolegal research in the era of digitalization, such as video observation and online ethnography, highlighting the significance of storytelling. The article advocates for a balanced and reflective approach to digitalization in Chinese sociology of law, emphasizing the potential for meaningful advancements in the field when digital technologies are employed judiciously and responsibly.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBrill-
dc.relation.ispartofChina law and society review-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectdigital superstition-
dc.subjectdigitalization-
dc.subjectmethodology-
dc.subjectsociology of law-
dc.subjecttechnology-
dc.titleAgainst Digital Superstition: On the Pseudoscientific Development of the Sociology of Law in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/25427466-20250002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105005639789-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage51-
dc.identifier.epage73-
dc.identifier.eissn2542-7466-
dc.identifier.issnl2542-7458-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats