File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A global systematic review of the remote sensing vegetation indices

TitleA global systematic review of the remote sensing vegetation indices
Authors
KeywordsEcological
Remote sensing
Sensitivity analysis
Systematic literature review
Vegetation indices
Issue Date1-May-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2025, v. 139 How to Cite?
AbstractVegetation indices (VIs), with the advantages of being easy to understand, simple form, and robust, have emerged as a pivotal and widespread tool for monitoring and assessing vegetation health and dynamics. Decades of research have produced numerous VIs, broadening their use and impact across various fields, but possibly overwhelming users with too many options. This study conducted a bibliometric review of VI-related literature in the web of science (WOS) database since 1986, examining current trends and issues in data sources, geographic areas, eco-functional areas, applications, and technical methods. It also analyzed the correlation among 86 VIs from global satellite data and assessed the sensitivity of 16 VIs to different parameters using radiative transfer model simulations at leaf and canopy scales. This review revealed that (1) VI research accelerated since 1986, particularly after 2012, largely due to the availability of earth-observing satellite data and new VIs. (2) The central concern of VI is its sensitivity to vegetation parameters, with recent interest in complex terrain effects. (3) VI is difficult to distinguish structural and spectral information. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices (OSAVI) has the highest sensitivity to leaf area index (LAI), and Sentinel-2 red edge position (S2REP) has the highest sensitivity to chlorophyll among the 16 selected VIs. Overall, VI performance depends on band selection and formula, with an ideal VI balancing sensitivity to vegetation and interference resistance. VI Selection should be tailored to user needs, focusing on relevant vegetation parameters and the study area's conditions.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366417
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 7.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.108

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYan, Kai-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Si-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Guangjian-
dc.contributor.authorMa, Xuanlong-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiuzhi-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Jinhua-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Sicong-
dc.contributor.authorGastellu-Etchegorry, Jean Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorMyneni, Ranga B-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qiao-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:19:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:19:18Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2025, v. 139-
dc.identifier.issn1569-8432-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366417-
dc.description.abstractVegetation indices (VIs), with the advantages of being easy to understand, simple form, and robust, have emerged as a pivotal and widespread tool for monitoring and assessing vegetation health and dynamics. Decades of research have produced numerous VIs, broadening their use and impact across various fields, but possibly overwhelming users with too many options. This study conducted a bibliometric review of VI-related literature in the web of science (WOS) database since 1986, examining current trends and issues in data sources, geographic areas, eco-functional areas, applications, and technical methods. It also analyzed the correlation among 86 VIs from global satellite data and assessed the sensitivity of 16 VIs to different parameters using radiative transfer model simulations at leaf and canopy scales. This review revealed that (1) VI research accelerated since 1986, particularly after 2012, largely due to the availability of earth-observing satellite data and new VIs. (2) The central concern of VI is its sensitivity to vegetation parameters, with recent interest in complex terrain effects. (3) VI is difficult to distinguish structural and spectral information. Optimization of soil-adjusted vegetation indices (OSAVI) has the highest sensitivity to leaf area index (LAI), and Sentinel-2 red edge position (S2REP) has the highest sensitivity to chlorophyll among the 16 selected VIs. Overall, VI performance depends on band selection and formula, with an ideal VI balancing sensitivity to vegetation and interference resistance. VI Selection should be tailored to user needs, focusing on relevant vegetation parameters and the study area's conditions.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEcological-
dc.subjectRemote sensing-
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis-
dc.subjectSystematic literature review-
dc.subjectVegetation indices-
dc.titleA global systematic review of the remote sensing vegetation indices-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jag.2025.104560-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105003849433-
dc.identifier.volume139-
dc.identifier.eissn1872-826X-
dc.identifier.issnl1569-8432-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats