File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.22916/jcpc.2025..43.193
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105001676949
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Reconciling Cosmopolitanism with the Ethics of Personal Relationships: Solutions from Historical Confucian Philosophy
| Title | Reconciling Cosmopolitanism with the Ethics of Personal Relationships: Solutions from Historical Confucian Philosophy |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | care with distinctions cosmopolitanism Mencius Mengzi role ethics |
| Issue Date | 28-Feb-2025 |
| Publisher | Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture |
| Citation | Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 2025, v. 43, n. special, p. 193-219 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This paper is about the following questions: how, exactly, do the historical Confucian philosophers account for the ethical value of cosmopolitan care? More specifically, how do Mengzi (Mencius) and later Mengzi-inspired Confucian philosophers conceive of the ethical basis for caring about non-citizen strangers? These questions are both important in their own right and also offer a way of testing the limits of the widespread characterization of Confucian ethics as relational or role-based. I explore two possibilities in detail. The first is that moderate care for non-citizen strangers is good insofar as it is consistent with “graded love” or “care with distinctions,” which itself is a necessary feature of humane virtue (ren 仁). The second is that care for non-citizen strangers is based on roles or relationships between the agent and the non-citizen, perhaps as members of a larger (trans-national or interstate) community. I argue that the first possibility is far more consistent with the texts than the latter, and that the latter stretches the notion of a (social) relationship too far. I also draw some conclusions about the ways in which Mengzi-style Confucian ethics is and is not properly characterized as “relational,” and note some advantages of Mengzian cosmopolitanism rightly understood. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366408 |
| ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.116 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Tiwald, Justin | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-25T04:19:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-25T04:19:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-02-28 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, 2025, v. 43, n. special, p. 193-219 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1598-267X | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366408 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper is about the following questions: how, exactly, do the historical Confucian philosophers account for the ethical value of cosmopolitan care? More specifically, how do Mengzi (Mencius) and later Mengzi-inspired Confucian philosophers conceive of the ethical basis for caring about non-citizen strangers? These questions are both important in their own right and also offer a way of testing the limits of the widespread characterization of Confucian ethics as relational or role-based. I explore two possibilities in detail. The first is that moderate care for non-citizen strangers is good insofar as it is consistent with “graded love” or “care with distinctions,” which itself is a necessary feature of humane virtue (ren 仁). The second is that care for non-citizen strangers is based on roles or relationships between the agent and the non-citizen, perhaps as members of a larger (trans-national or interstate) community. I argue that the first possibility is far more consistent with the texts than the latter, and that the latter stretches the notion of a (social) relationship too far. I also draw some conclusions about the ways in which Mengzi-style Confucian ethics is and is not properly characterized as “relational,” and note some advantages of Mengzian cosmopolitanism rightly understood. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | care with distinctions | - |
| dc.subject | cosmopolitanism | - |
| dc.subject | Mencius | - |
| dc.subject | Mengzi | - |
| dc.subject | role ethics | - |
| dc.title | Reconciling Cosmopolitanism with the Ethics of Personal Relationships: Solutions from Historical Confucian Philosophy | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.22916/jcpc.2025..43.193 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105001676949 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | special | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 193 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 219 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2734-1356 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1598-267X | - |
