File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/14479338.2019.1585860
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85083490350
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Community interactions at crowd scale: hybrid crowds on the GitHub platform
| Title | Community interactions at crowd scale: hybrid crowds on the GitHub platform |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | community crowd GitHub Open innovation |
| Issue Date | 2020 |
| Citation | Innovation Organization and Management, 2020, v. 22, n. 2, p. 105-127 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Communities and crowds have both been popular settings for the study of open innovation, but until recently, scholars have tended to study each in relative isolation from the other. The separate study of communities and crowds may mask commonalities and areas of overlap. In this exploratory study, we examine hybrid crowds, which exhibit norms of reciprocity common in communities, as well as patterns of contribution dispersion common in crowds. We show empirical variation along these two dimensions using data from six machine learning projects hosted on the GitHub software platform. We discuss the implications of hybrid crowds for sponsoring firms and opportunities for further research by scholars of open innovation. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366075 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.184 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Sims, Jonathan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Woodard, C. Jason | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-14T07:15:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-14T07:15:09Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Innovation Organization and Management, 2020, v. 22, n. 2, p. 105-127 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1447-9338 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/366075 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Communities and crowds have both been popular settings for the study of open innovation, but until recently, scholars have tended to study each in relative isolation from the other. The separate study of communities and crowds may mask commonalities and areas of overlap. In this exploratory study, we examine hybrid crowds, which exhibit norms of reciprocity common in communities, as well as patterns of contribution dispersion common in crowds. We show empirical variation along these two dimensions using data from six machine learning projects hosted on the GitHub software platform. We discuss the implications of hybrid crowds for sponsoring firms and opportunities for further research by scholars of open innovation. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Innovation Organization and Management | - |
| dc.subject | community | - |
| dc.subject | crowd | - |
| dc.subject | GitHub | - |
| dc.subject | Open innovation | - |
| dc.title | Community interactions at crowd scale: hybrid crowds on the GitHub platform | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/14479338.2019.1585860 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85083490350 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 22 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 105 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 127 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2204-0226 | - |
