File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A systematic review of urban vitality studies: Trends and research opportunities

TitleA systematic review of urban vitality studies: Trends and research opportunities
Authors
KeywordsPRISMA
Street vitality
Systematic review
Urban vibrancy
Urban vitality
Issue Date5-Sep-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Land Use Policy, 2025, v. 158 How to Cite?
AbstractUrban vitality serves as a crucial indicator of sustainable city development. However, little is known about trends and potential research opportunities in urban vitality. Thus, this paper systematically reviews urban vitality studies to synthesize research themes and identify key research directions. Specifically, we provide an overview of the main topics, methods, and data in related studies, summarizing findings and pinpointing areas for further investigation. Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, we identified 191 relevant studies from 941 peer-reviewed articles. Results revealed that Southern Europe and East Asia emerged as the most extensively researched geographic regions, with China featuring prominently in the number of urban vitality studies. Our review identifies urban vitality measurement (35.6 %) and its associated factors (64.4 %) as primary research themes. It also highlights a tendency in current studies to overlook assessment biases stemming from urban functions and seasonal variations. While the relationship between urban vitality and the built environment receives ample attention, the impacts of urban vitality on sustainability (environmental, social, and economic issues) remain less elucidated. Furthermore, we observe that previous studies of influencing factors on urban vitality often rely on linear models, neglecting nonlinearity, interactions among factors, and causality. We also note a shift from traditional data sources to big data, allowing scholars to assess urban vitality more comprehensively. We thus discussed potential research directions for future studies. This paper advances understanding of urban vitality research by delineating trends, gaps and identifying avenues for future studies.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/365999
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.847

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoan, Quang Cuong-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xiaohu-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-14T02:40:53Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-14T02:40:53Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-05-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy, 2025, v. 158-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/365999-
dc.description.abstractUrban vitality serves as a crucial indicator of sustainable city development. However, little is known about trends and potential research opportunities in urban vitality. Thus, this paper systematically reviews urban vitality studies to synthesize research themes and identify key research directions. Specifically, we provide an overview of the main topics, methods, and data in related studies, summarizing findings and pinpointing areas for further investigation. Employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, we identified 191 relevant studies from 941 peer-reviewed articles. Results revealed that Southern Europe and East Asia emerged as the most extensively researched geographic regions, with China featuring prominently in the number of urban vitality studies. Our review identifies urban vitality measurement (35.6 %) and its associated factors (64.4 %) as primary research themes. It also highlights a tendency in current studies to overlook assessment biases stemming from urban functions and seasonal variations. While the relationship between urban vitality and the built environment receives ample attention, the impacts of urban vitality on sustainability (environmental, social, and economic issues) remain less elucidated. Furthermore, we observe that previous studies of influencing factors on urban vitality often rely on linear models, neglecting nonlinearity, interactions among factors, and causality. We also note a shift from traditional data sources to big data, allowing scholars to assess urban vitality more comprehensively. We thus discussed potential research directions for future studies. This paper advances understanding of urban vitality research by delineating trends, gaps and identifying avenues for future studies.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofLand Use Policy-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectPRISMA-
dc.subjectStreet vitality-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectUrban vibrancy-
dc.subjectUrban vitality-
dc.titleA systematic review of urban vitality studies: Trends and research opportunities-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107745-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105014930267-
dc.identifier.volume158-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5754-
dc.identifier.issnl0264-8377-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats