File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Impacts of local and regional carbon markets in Hong Kong and China's Greater Bay Area: A dynamic CGE analysis

TitleImpacts of local and regional carbon markets in Hong Kong and China's Greater Bay Area: A dynamic CGE analysis
Authors
KeywordsComputable general equilibrium
Emissions trading
Greater Bay Area
Hong Kong
Regional carbon market
Issue Date1-Sep-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Energy Policy, 2025, v. 204 How to Cite?
AbstractWe examine the potential economic impacts of local and regional carbon markets in Hong Kong and China's Greater Bay Area, taking a computable general equilibrium approach. We find that Hong Kong's proposed carbon-neutrality target requires policy-compliance costs as large as ≤21.0 % of its baseline gross domestic product, but regional cooperation can help reduce the costs substantially. For example, the costs will decline by ≤23.0 % if Hong Kong forms an integrated carbon market with Shenzhen. The cost savings will further increase to ≤38.2 % if Hong Kong cooperates with Shenzhen and Guangdong to create an extended regional carbon market. Such an integrated carbon market will be mutually beneficial, and will also help Shenzhen and Guangdong meet their own carbon-reduction goals at ≤13.9 % and ≤5.2 % lower costs, respectively. These regional cooperation scenarios, though benefiting all participants, will make Hong Kong—which sets an ambitious climate-mitigation target at the city level, despite its tiny local carbon market—the biggest winner. Accordingly, Hong Kong has a great incentive to promote an integrated regional carbon market, but increasing its feasibility may require an institutional device to reduce the imbalance in benefit across regional stakeholders.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/365997
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.388

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Ji-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorNam, Kyung Min-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-14T02:40:52Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-14T02:40:52Z-
dc.date.issued2025-09-01-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Policy, 2025, v. 204-
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/365997-
dc.description.abstractWe examine the potential economic impacts of local and regional carbon markets in Hong Kong and China's Greater Bay Area, taking a computable general equilibrium approach. We find that Hong Kong's proposed carbon-neutrality target requires policy-compliance costs as large as ≤21.0 % of its baseline gross domestic product, but regional cooperation can help reduce the costs substantially. For example, the costs will decline by ≤23.0 % if Hong Kong forms an integrated carbon market with Shenzhen. The cost savings will further increase to ≤38.2 % if Hong Kong cooperates with Shenzhen and Guangdong to create an extended regional carbon market. Such an integrated carbon market will be mutually beneficial, and will also help Shenzhen and Guangdong meet their own carbon-reduction goals at ≤13.9 % and ≤5.2 % lower costs, respectively. These regional cooperation scenarios, though benefiting all participants, will make Hong Kong—which sets an ambitious climate-mitigation target at the city level, despite its tiny local carbon market—the biggest winner. Accordingly, Hong Kong has a great incentive to promote an integrated regional carbon market, but increasing its feasibility may require an institutional device to reduce the imbalance in benefit across regional stakeholders.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofEnergy Policy-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectComputable general equilibrium-
dc.subjectEmissions trading-
dc.subjectGreater Bay Area-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjectRegional carbon market-
dc.titleImpacts of local and regional carbon markets in Hong Kong and China's Greater Bay Area: A dynamic CGE analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114651-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105003993703-
dc.identifier.volume204-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6777-
dc.identifier.issnl0301-4215-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats