File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0993
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-48649099481
- PMID: 18369100
- Find via

Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Copy number variant analysis of human embryonic stem cells
| Title | Copy number variant analysis of human embryonic stem cells |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Algorithmic biology Embryonic stem cells Genome stability Multipoint statistics Oligonucleotide array sequence analysis |
| Issue Date | 2008 |
| Citation | Stem Cells, 2008, v. 26, n. 6, p. 1484-1489 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Differences between individual DNA sequences provide the basis for human genetic variability. Forms of genetic variation include single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions/duplications, deletions, and inversions/ translocations. The genome of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) has been characterized mainly by karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), techniques whose relatively low resolution at 2-10 megabases (Mb) cannot accurately determine most copy number variability, which is estimated to involve 10%-20% of the genome. In this brief technical study, we examined HSF1 and HSF6 hESCs using array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine copy number variants (CNVs) as a higher-resolution method for characterizing hESCs. Our approach used five samples for each hESC line and showed four consistent CNVs for HSF1 and five consistent CNVs for HSF6. These consistent CNVs included amplifications and deletions that ranged in size from 20 kilobases to 1.48 megabases, involved seven different chromosomes, were both shared and unique between hESCs, and were maintained during neuronal stem/progenitor cell differentiation or drug selection. Thirty HSF1 and 40 HSF6 less consistently scored but still highly significant candidate CNVs were also identified. Overall, aCGH provides a promising approach for uniquely identifying hESCs and their derivatives and highlights a potential genomic source for distinct differentiation and functional potentials that lower-resolution karyotype and CGH techniques could miss. ©AlphaMed Press. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365677 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.396 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wu, Hao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kevin J. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mehta, Kshama | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Paxia, Salvatore | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sundstrom, Andrew | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Anantharaman, Thomas | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuraishy, Ali I. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Doan, Tri | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghosh, Jayati | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Pyle, April D. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Clark, Amander | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lowry, William | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fan, Guoping | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Baxter, Tim | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Mishra, Bud | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Sun, Yi | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Teitell, Michael A. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-05T09:46:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-05T09:46:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Stem Cells, 2008, v. 26, n. 6, p. 1484-1489 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1066-5099 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365677 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Differences between individual DNA sequences provide the basis for human genetic variability. Forms of genetic variation include single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions/duplications, deletions, and inversions/ translocations. The genome of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) has been characterized mainly by karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), techniques whose relatively low resolution at 2-10 megabases (Mb) cannot accurately determine most copy number variability, which is estimated to involve 10%-20% of the genome. In this brief technical study, we examined HSF1 and HSF6 hESCs using array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to determine copy number variants (CNVs) as a higher-resolution method for characterizing hESCs. Our approach used five samples for each hESC line and showed four consistent CNVs for HSF1 and five consistent CNVs for HSF6. These consistent CNVs included amplifications and deletions that ranged in size from 20 kilobases to 1.48 megabases, involved seven different chromosomes, were both shared and unique between hESCs, and were maintained during neuronal stem/progenitor cell differentiation or drug selection. Thirty HSF1 and 40 HSF6 less consistently scored but still highly significant candidate CNVs were also identified. Overall, aCGH provides a promising approach for uniquely identifying hESCs and their derivatives and highlights a potential genomic source for distinct differentiation and functional potentials that lower-resolution karyotype and CGH techniques could miss. ©AlphaMed Press. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Stem Cells | - |
| dc.subject | Algorithmic biology | - |
| dc.subject | Embryonic stem cells | - |
| dc.subject | Genome stability | - |
| dc.subject | Multipoint statistics | - |
| dc.subject | Oligonucleotide array sequence analysis | - |
| dc.title | Copy number variant analysis of human embryonic stem cells | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0993 | - |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 18369100 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-48649099481 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 26 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 1484 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 1489 | - |
