File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2133718
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85142201475
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: High-Dimensional Portfolio Selection with Cardinality Constraints
| Title | High-Dimensional Portfolio Selection with Cardinality Constraints |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Expected utility maximization Fenchel-Rockafellar duality Portfolio management Safe screening Sample average approximation |
| Issue Date | 2023 |
| Citation | Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2023, v. 118, n. 542, p. 779-791 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | The expanding number of assets offers more opportunities for investors but poses new challenges for modern portfolio management (PM). As a central plank of PM, portfolio selection by expected utility maximization (EUM) faces uncontrollable estimation and optimization errors in ultrahigh-dimensional scenarios. Past strategies for high-dimensional PM mainly concern only large-cap companies and select many stocks, making PM impractical. We propose a sample-average-approximation-based portfolio strategy to tackle the difficulties above with cardinality constraints. Our strategy bypasses the estimation of mean and covariance, the Chinese walls in high-dimensional scenarios. Empirical results on S&P 500 and Russell 2000 show that an appropriate number of carefully chosen assets leads to better out-of-sample mean-variance efficiency. On Russell 2000, our best portfolio profits as much as the equally weighted portfolio but reduces the maximum drawdown and the average number of assets by 10% and 90%, respectively. The flexibility and the stability of incorporating factor signals for augmenting out-of-sample performances are also demonstrated. Our strategy balances the tradeoff among the return, the risk, and the number of assets with cardinality constraints. Therefore, we provide a theoretically sound and computationally efficient strategy to make PM practical in the growing global financial market. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365517 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.922 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Du, Jin Hong | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Guo, Yifeng | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Xueqin | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-05T09:41:13Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-05T09:41:13Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2023, v. 118, n. 542, p. 779-791 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0162-1459 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365517 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The expanding number of assets offers more opportunities for investors but poses new challenges for modern portfolio management (PM). As a central plank of PM, portfolio selection by expected utility maximization (EUM) faces uncontrollable estimation and optimization errors in ultrahigh-dimensional scenarios. Past strategies for high-dimensional PM mainly concern only large-cap companies and select many stocks, making PM impractical. We propose a sample-average-approximation-based portfolio strategy to tackle the difficulties above with cardinality constraints. Our strategy bypasses the estimation of mean and covariance, the Chinese walls in high-dimensional scenarios. Empirical results on S&P 500 and Russell 2000 show that an appropriate number of carefully chosen assets leads to better out-of-sample mean-variance efficiency. On Russell 2000, our best portfolio profits as much as the equally weighted portfolio but reduces the maximum drawdown and the average number of assets by 10% and 90%, respectively. The flexibility and the stability of incorporating factor signals for augmenting out-of-sample performances are also demonstrated. Our strategy balances the tradeoff among the return, the risk, and the number of assets with cardinality constraints. Therefore, we provide a theoretically sound and computationally efficient strategy to make PM practical in the growing global financial market. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the American Statistical Association | - |
| dc.subject | Expected utility maximization | - |
| dc.subject | Fenchel-Rockafellar duality | - |
| dc.subject | Portfolio management | - |
| dc.subject | Safe screening | - |
| dc.subject | Sample average approximation | - |
| dc.title | High-Dimensional Portfolio Selection with Cardinality Constraints | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01621459.2022.2133718 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85142201475 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 118 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 542 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 779 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 791 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1537-274X | - |
