File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1017/S0272263124000433
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85215855567
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Modulating motion event categorization through brief training: Meaning-focused versus form-focused instructional conditions
| Title | Modulating motion event categorization through brief training: Meaning-focused versus form-focused instructional conditions |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Instructional condition meaning-focused metalinguistic explanation rule search |
| Issue Date | 2025 |
| Citation | Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2025, v. 47, n. 1, p. 53-79 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | There is evidence that learning a second language (L2) can shift cognition toward that predicted for the L2 and that this effect might vary with L2 proficiency, age of acquisition, length of immersion, etc. Here we explore the previously neglected variable of language instructional conditions. Participants categorized motion events in a triads-matching task after being trained on two novel linguistic labels highlighting (in)transitivity through one of three instructional conditions. Participants who learned the relevant knowledge under a meaning-focused instructional condition (memorizing meanings of exemplar sentences) showed a higher likelihood of categorizing based on motion (in)transitivity immediately after training than a control group; those who learned under a required rule search instructional condition showed this effect only after additional practice; while those who learned through another type of form-focused instructional condition (direct metalinguistic explanation) did not show this effect even after such practice. These differences were obtained despite the fact that the three groups were matched on awareness of the target system at the level of understanding and near-perfect performance on a grammaticality judgment task. The findings are discussed in terms of the depth of processing in instructed SLA and models of language-cognition interactions. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365446 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.124 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Xue, Yuyan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, John N. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-05T09:40:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-05T09:40:36Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2025, v. 47, n. 1, p. 53-79 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0272-2631 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/365446 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | There is evidence that learning a second language (L2) can shift cognition toward that predicted for the L2 and that this effect might vary with L2 proficiency, age of acquisition, length of immersion, etc. Here we explore the previously neglected variable of language instructional conditions. Participants categorized motion events in a triads-matching task after being trained on two novel linguistic labels highlighting (in)transitivity through one of three instructional conditions. Participants who learned the relevant knowledge under a meaning-focused instructional condition (memorizing meanings of exemplar sentences) showed a higher likelihood of categorizing based on motion (in)transitivity immediately after training than a control group; those who learned under a required rule search instructional condition showed this effect only after additional practice; while those who learned through another type of form-focused instructional condition (direct metalinguistic explanation) did not show this effect even after such practice. These differences were obtained despite the fact that the three groups were matched on awareness of the target system at the level of understanding and near-perfect performance on a grammaticality judgment task. The findings are discussed in terms of the depth of processing in instructed SLA and models of language-cognition interactions. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Studies in Second Language Acquisition | - |
| dc.subject | Instructional condition | - |
| dc.subject | meaning-focused | - |
| dc.subject | metalinguistic explanation | - |
| dc.subject | rule search | - |
| dc.title | Modulating motion event categorization through brief training: Meaning-focused versus form-focused instructional conditions | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0272263124000433 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85215855567 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 47 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 53 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 79 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1470-1545 | - |
