File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Oratorical Leadership of Chief Justices in Post-Handover Hong Kong

TitleOratorical Leadership of Chief Justices in Post-Handover Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date25-May-2025
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2025, v. 23, n. 1, p. 298-319 How to Cite?
Abstract

This article examines how Hong Kong’s three post-handover chief justices—Andrew Li, Geoffrey Ma, and Andrew Cheung—have responded to constitutional and political challenges through their public speeches, statements, and interviews. It observes that Li adopted a bold and proactive approach that connected Hong Kong’s legal system with the wider common law world, while Ma sought greater engagement with the general public on rule-of-law issues. Cheung’s approach, in contrast, has thus far been more conciliatory and circumspect than that of his predecessors. Despite the differing leadership styles adopted by the three chief justices and the distinct nature of the challenges they have faced, the task for all three has been to find an equilibrium between liberal and authoritarian ideologies that sustains Hong Kong’s common law legal system without compromising Chinese sovereignty, and an element of pragmatism underlies all three leaders’ oratory approaches.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364196
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.463

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYam, Julius Shi-rong-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cora Sau Wai-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-25T00:35:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-25T00:35:26Z-
dc.date.issued2025-05-25-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Constitutional Law, 2025, v. 23, n. 1, p. 298-319-
dc.identifier.issn1474-2640-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364196-
dc.description.abstract<p>This article examines how Hong Kong’s three post-handover chief justices—Andrew Li, Geoffrey Ma, and Andrew Cheung—have responded to constitutional and political challenges through their public speeches, statements, and interviews. It observes that Li adopted a bold and proactive approach that connected Hong Kong’s legal system with the wider common law world, while Ma sought greater engagement with the general public on rule-of-law issues. Cheung’s approach, in contrast, has thus far been more conciliatory and circumspect than that of his predecessors. Despite the differing leadership styles adopted by the three chief justices and the distinct nature of the challenges they have faced, the task for all three has been to find an equilibrium between liberal and authoritarian ideologies that sustains Hong Kong’s common law legal system without compromising Chinese sovereignty, and an element of pragmatism underlies all three leaders’ oratory approaches.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Constitutional Law-
dc.titleOratorical Leadership of Chief Justices in Post-Handover Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icon/moaf012-
dc.identifier.volume23-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage298-
dc.identifier.epage319-
dc.identifier.eissn1474-2659-
dc.identifier.issnl1474-2640-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats