File Download
Supplementary

Student Project: Students versus artificial intelligence in assessing dental plaque remotely : who outperforms?

TitleStudents versus artificial intelligence in assessing dental plaque remotely : who outperforms?
Authors
Issue Date2024
PublisherThe University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong)
Citation
Chau, K. T., Chau, T., Chow, C. Y., Ho, S. Y., Leung, W. L., Li, H. Y., Mak, Y. H., Wong, O. S., Yu, K. H.. (2024). Students versus artificial intelligence in assessing dental plaque remotely : who outperforms?. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.
AbstractAims: Our community health project aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of dental plaque assessments by dental students versus an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model. Methods: Healthy volunteers were recruited, and digital images of their anterior teeth were obtained following plaque disclosure. Cropped images of individual teeth were created in Photoshop®. Plaque assessments from the individually cropped images were conducted employing three standardized measures: 1) O’Leary (1972), 2) Greene-Vermillion (1964), and 3) Turesky Modified Quigley Hein (TMQH) (1970). Students were trained and calibrated in the use of the three indices. With assistance from a computer scientist and dentist, a deep learning model (AI) was developed to assess plaque according to the criteria of the three plaque indices. The accuracy of students' assessments of plaque was determined with respect to the gold standard (group facilitator’s assessments). Likewise, the accuracy of the AI models' assessment of plaque was determined with respect to the gold standard. Students’ accuracy of plaque assessments were compared with that of the accuracy of the AI models. Results: Of the 546 cropped images obtained, 97.8% (n=534) were amenable for plaque assessment analysis. Students' inter- and intra-examiner reliability across the three plaque indices was good/excellent (Kappa ≥0.70). For the O’Leary index, the accuracy of students’ was high (Team A 0.99, Team B 0.97), and for the AI model accuracy was 0.94. For the GV index, the accuracy of students’ assessment ranged from 0.94-0.99 and for the AI model it ranged from 0.89-0.99. For the TMQH index, the accuracy of students’ assessment ranged from 0.93 -0.99 and for the AI model, it ranged from 0.82- 0.98. Conclusions: Dental students’ accuracy in assessing plaque levels remotely from photographic images was consistently high, irrespective of the plaque assessment index criteria. The artificial intelligence (AI) models (deep learning) accuracy in assessing plaque levels was consistently high and comparable to dental students’ assessments. The findings of our community health project have implications for using AI in assessing dental plaque remotely.
SubjectDental plaque
Artificial intelligence - Medical applications
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364046
Series/Report no.Community health project (University of Hong Kong. Faculty of Dentistry) ; vno. 267.
Report series (University of Hong Kong. Faculty of Dentistry) ; no. 267.

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChau, Ka Tsung-
dc.contributor.authorChau, Trisha-
dc.contributor.authorChow, Cheuk Yin-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Sin Ying-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Wing Lam-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hoi Yiu-
dc.contributor.authorMak, Yi Hang-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Oi Shuen-
dc.contributor.authorYu, Ka Hei-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-20T03:40:08Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-20T03:40:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationChau, K. T., Chau, T., Chow, C. Y., Ho, S. Y., Leung, W. L., Li, H. Y., Mak, Y. H., Wong, O. S., Yu, K. H.. (2024). Students versus artificial intelligence in assessing dental plaque remotely : who outperforms?. (Thesis). University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR.-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/364046-
dc.description.abstractAims: Our community health project aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of dental plaque assessments by dental students versus an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model. Methods: Healthy volunteers were recruited, and digital images of their anterior teeth were obtained following plaque disclosure. Cropped images of individual teeth were created in Photoshop®. Plaque assessments from the individually cropped images were conducted employing three standardized measures: 1) O’Leary (1972), 2) Greene-Vermillion (1964), and 3) Turesky Modified Quigley Hein (TMQH) (1970). Students were trained and calibrated in the use of the three indices. With assistance from a computer scientist and dentist, a deep learning model (AI) was developed to assess plaque according to the criteria of the three plaque indices. The accuracy of students' assessments of plaque was determined with respect to the gold standard (group facilitator’s assessments). Likewise, the accuracy of the AI models' assessment of plaque was determined with respect to the gold standard. Students’ accuracy of plaque assessments were compared with that of the accuracy of the AI models. Results: Of the 546 cropped images obtained, 97.8% (n=534) were amenable for plaque assessment analysis. Students' inter- and intra-examiner reliability across the three plaque indices was good/excellent (Kappa ≥0.70). For the O’Leary index, the accuracy of students’ was high (Team A 0.99, Team B 0.97), and for the AI model accuracy was 0.94. For the GV index, the accuracy of students’ assessment ranged from 0.94-0.99 and for the AI model it ranged from 0.89-0.99. For the TMQH index, the accuracy of students’ assessment ranged from 0.93 -0.99 and for the AI model, it ranged from 0.82- 0.98. Conclusions: Dental students’ accuracy in assessing plaque levels remotely from photographic images was consistently high, irrespective of the plaque assessment index criteria. The artificial intelligence (AI) models (deep learning) accuracy in assessing plaque levels was consistently high and comparable to dental students’ assessments. The findings of our community health project have implications for using AI in assessing dental plaque remotely. -
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong)-
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Health Project-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCommunity health project (University of Hong Kong. Faculty of Dentistry) ; vno. 267.-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReport series (University of Hong Kong. Faculty of Dentistry) ; no. 267.-
dc.rightsThe author retains all proprietary rights, (such as patent rights) and the right to use in future works.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subject.lcshDental plaque-
dc.subject.lcshArtificial intelligence - Medical applications-
dc.titleStudents versus artificial intelligence in assessing dental plaque remotely : who outperforms?-
dc.typeStudent_Project-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.mmsid991045115531703414-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats