File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Which digit is larger? Brain responses to number and size interactions in a numerical Stroop task

TitleWhich digit is larger? Brain responses to number and size interactions in a numerical Stroop task
Authors
KeywordsERP
facilitation
interference
LPC
N200
N450
numerical Stroop
Issue Date2021
Citation
Psychophysiology, 2021, v. 58, n. 3, article no. e13744 How to Cite?
AbstractWhen comparing the digits of different physical sizes, the processing of numerical value interacts with the processing of physical size. Given the universal use of Arabic numbers in mathematics and daily life, this study aims to elucidate the cognitive processes involved in the interactions of task-relevant and task-irrelevant features during information processing. We investigated this question by examining event-related potential (ERP) using a modified version of the size congruity comparison, which is a Stroop-like task. Numerical value and physical size were varied independently under task-relevant and task-irrelevant conditions. To better examine how the task-irrelevant features modulated the processing of the task-relevant attributes, a neutral condition was included in both tasks. For the physical task, congruent trials showed a less negative N200 response than neutral trials (indicating a facilitation effect), and incongruent trials elicited a larger N450 and smaller late positive complex (LPC) response than neutral trials (indicating an interference effect). For the numerical task, congruent trials showed a larger LPC response than neutral trials (indicating a facilitation effect). These ERP findings indicate that the sources of the facilitation and interference effects appear in different cognitive processes for each task. We further suggest that language characteristics may be a factor in the superior numerical processing exhibited in this study.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363778
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.303

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Hsu Wen-
dc.contributor.authorNascimben, Mauro-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Ya Yi-
dc.contributor.authorFong, Dong Yang-
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, Ovid J.L.-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chih Mao-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-10T07:49:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-10T07:49:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationPsychophysiology, 2021, v. 58, n. 3, article no. e13744-
dc.identifier.issn0048-5772-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363778-
dc.description.abstractWhen comparing the digits of different physical sizes, the processing of numerical value interacts with the processing of physical size. Given the universal use of Arabic numbers in mathematics and daily life, this study aims to elucidate the cognitive processes involved in the interactions of task-relevant and task-irrelevant features during information processing. We investigated this question by examining event-related potential (ERP) using a modified version of the size congruity comparison, which is a Stroop-like task. Numerical value and physical size were varied independently under task-relevant and task-irrelevant conditions. To better examine how the task-irrelevant features modulated the processing of the task-relevant attributes, a neutral condition was included in both tasks. For the physical task, congruent trials showed a less negative N200 response than neutral trials (indicating a facilitation effect), and incongruent trials elicited a larger N450 and smaller late positive complex (LPC) response than neutral trials (indicating an interference effect). For the numerical task, congruent trials showed a larger LPC response than neutral trials (indicating a facilitation effect). These ERP findings indicate that the sources of the facilitation and interference effects appear in different cognitive processes for each task. We further suggest that language characteristics may be a factor in the superior numerical processing exhibited in this study.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPsychophysiology-
dc.subjectERP-
dc.subjectfacilitation-
dc.subjectinterference-
dc.subjectLPC-
dc.subjectN200-
dc.subjectN450-
dc.subjectnumerical Stroop-
dc.titleWhich digit is larger? Brain responses to number and size interactions in a numerical Stroop task-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/psyp.13744-
dc.identifier.pmid33314155-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85097504989-
dc.identifier.volume58-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e13744-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e13744-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8986-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats