File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Think Hard or Think Smart: Network Reconfigurations After Divergent Thinking Associate With Creativity Performance

TitleThink Hard or Think Smart: Network Reconfigurations After Divergent Thinking Associate With Creativity Performance
Authors
Keywordsalternative usage task (AUT)
creative achievement questionnaire (CAQ)
creativity
divergent thinking
functional connectivity
resting-state fMRI
Issue Date2020
Citation
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020, v. 14, article no. 571118 How to Cite?
AbstractEvidence suggests divergent thinking is the cognitive basis of creative thoughts. Neuroimaging literature using resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) has revealed network reorganizations during divergent thinking. Recent studies have revealed the changes of network organizations when performing creativity tasks, but such brain reconfigurations may be prolonged after task and be modulated by the trait of creativity. To investigate the dynamic reconfiguration, 40 young participants were recruited to perform consecutive Alternative Uses Tasks (AUTs) for divergent thinking and two resting-state scans (before and after AUT) were used for mapping the brain reorganizations after AUT. We split participants into high- and low-creative groups based on creative achievement questionnaire (CAQ) and targeted on reconfigurations of the two brain networks: (1) default-mode network (DMN) and (2) the network seeded at the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) because the between-group difference of AUT-induced brain activation located at the left IFG. The changes of post-AUT RSFCs (DMN and IFGN) indicated the prolonged effect of divergent thinking. More specifically, the alterations of RSFCIFG−AG and RSFCIFG−IPL (AG: angular gyrus, IPG: inferior parietal lobule) in the high-creative group had positive relationship with their AUT performances (originality and fluency), but not found in the low-creative group. Furthermore, the RSFC changes of DMN did not present significant relationships with AUT performances. The findings not only confirmed the possibility of brain dynamic reconfiguration following divergent thinking, but also suggested the distinct IFGN reconfiguration between individuals with different creativity levels.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363383

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Hong Yi-
dc.contributor.authorKuo, Bo Cheng-
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chih Mao-
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Pei Jung-
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Ai Ling-
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Li Ming-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Chi Yun-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jyh Horng-
dc.contributor.authorWu, Changwei W.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-10T07:46:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-10T07:46:25Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2020, v. 14, article no. 571118-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363383-
dc.description.abstractEvidence suggests divergent thinking is the cognitive basis of creative thoughts. Neuroimaging literature using resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) has revealed network reorganizations during divergent thinking. Recent studies have revealed the changes of network organizations when performing creativity tasks, but such brain reconfigurations may be prolonged after task and be modulated by the trait of creativity. To investigate the dynamic reconfiguration, 40 young participants were recruited to perform consecutive Alternative Uses Tasks (AUTs) for divergent thinking and two resting-state scans (before and after AUT) were used for mapping the brain reorganizations after AUT. We split participants into high- and low-creative groups based on creative achievement questionnaire (CAQ) and targeted on reconfigurations of the two brain networks: (1) default-mode network (DMN) and (2) the network seeded at the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) because the between-group difference of AUT-induced brain activation located at the left IFG. The changes of post-AUT RSFCs (DMN and IFGN) indicated the prolonged effect of divergent thinking. More specifically, the alterations of RSFC<inf>IFG−AG</inf> and RSFC<inf>IFG−IPL</inf> (AG: angular gyrus, IPG: inferior parietal lobule) in the high-creative group had positive relationship with their AUT performances (originality and fluency), but not found in the low-creative group. Furthermore, the RSFC changes of DMN did not present significant relationships with AUT performances. The findings not only confirmed the possibility of brain dynamic reconfiguration following divergent thinking, but also suggested the distinct IFGN reconfiguration between individuals with different creativity levels.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Human Neuroscience-
dc.subjectalternative usage task (AUT)-
dc.subjectcreative achievement questionnaire (CAQ)-
dc.subjectcreativity-
dc.subjectdivergent thinking-
dc.subjectfunctional connectivity-
dc.subjectresting-state fMRI-
dc.titleThink Hard or Think Smart: Network Reconfigurations After Divergent Thinking Associate With Creativity Performance-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnhum.2020.571118-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85097279391-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 571118-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 571118-
dc.identifier.eissn1662-5161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats