File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Non-Inferiority Trials in Stroke Research: What Are They, and How Should We Interpret Them?

TitleNon-Inferiority Trials in Stroke Research: What Are They, and How Should We Interpret Them?
Authors
KeywordsClinical trial
Methodology
Non-inferiority
Stroke
Trial design
Issue Date31-Jan-2025
Citation
Journal of Stroke, 2025, v. 27, n. 1, p. 41-51 How to Cite?
AbstractRandomized clinical trials are important in both clinical and academic stroke communities with increasing numbers of new design concepts emerging. One of the “less traditional” designs that have gained increasing interest in the last decade is non-inferiority trials. Whilst the concept might appear straightforward, the design and interpretation of non-inferiority trials can be challenging. In this review, we will use exemplars from clinical trials in the stroke field to provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of non-inferiority trials and how they should be interpreted in stroke research.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362852
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.841

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Linxin-
dc.contributor.authorLioutas, Vasileios Arsenios-
dc.contributor.authorAkyea, Ralph K.-
dc.contributor.authorGerner, Stefan-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Kui Kai-
dc.contributor.authorRamage, Emily-
dc.contributor.authorKatsanos, Aristeidis H.-
dc.contributor.authorHoward, George-
dc.contributor.authorBath, Philip M.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-03T00:35:35Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-03T00:35:35Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-31-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Stroke, 2025, v. 27, n. 1, p. 41-51-
dc.identifier.issn2287-6391-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362852-
dc.description.abstractRandomized clinical trials are important in both clinical and academic stroke communities with increasing numbers of new design concepts emerging. One of the “less traditional” designs that have gained increasing interest in the last decade is non-inferiority trials. Whilst the concept might appear straightforward, the design and interpretation of non-inferiority trials can be challenging. In this review, we will use exemplars from clinical trials in the stroke field to provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of non-inferiority trials and how they should be interpreted in stroke research.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Stroke-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectClinical trial-
dc.subjectMethodology-
dc.subjectNon-inferiority-
dc.subjectStroke-
dc.subjectTrial design-
dc.titleNon-Inferiority Trials in Stroke Research: What Are They, and How Should We Interpret Them?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.5853/jos.2024.03923-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85218131592-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage41-
dc.identifier.epage51-
dc.identifier.issnl2287-6391-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats