File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.5853/jos.2024.03923
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85218131592
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Non-Inferiority Trials in Stroke Research: What Are They, and How Should We Interpret Them?
| Title | Non-Inferiority Trials in Stroke Research: What Are They, and How Should We Interpret Them? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Clinical trial Methodology Non-inferiority Stroke Trial design |
| Issue Date | 31-Jan-2025 |
| Citation | Journal of Stroke, 2025, v. 27, n. 1, p. 41-51 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Randomized clinical trials are important in both clinical and academic stroke communities with increasing numbers of new design concepts emerging. One of the “less traditional” designs that have gained increasing interest in the last decade is non-inferiority trials. Whilst the concept might appear straightforward, the design and interpretation of non-inferiority trials can be challenging. In this review, we will use exemplars from clinical trials in the stroke field to provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of non-inferiority trials and how they should be interpreted in stroke research. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362852 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.841 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Linxin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lioutas, Vasileios Arsenios | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Akyea, Ralph K. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Gerner, Stefan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lau, Kui Kai | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramage, Emily | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Katsanos, Aristeidis H. | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Howard, George | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Bath, Philip M. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-03T00:35:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-03T00:35:35Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-31 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Stroke, 2025, v. 27, n. 1, p. 41-51 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2287-6391 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362852 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Randomized clinical trials are important in both clinical and academic stroke communities with increasing numbers of new design concepts emerging. One of the “less traditional” designs that have gained increasing interest in the last decade is non-inferiority trials. Whilst the concept might appear straightforward, the design and interpretation of non-inferiority trials can be challenging. In this review, we will use exemplars from clinical trials in the stroke field to provide an overview of the advantages and limitations of non-inferiority trials and how they should be interpreted in stroke research. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Stroke | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Clinical trial | - |
| dc.subject | Methodology | - |
| dc.subject | Non-inferiority | - |
| dc.subject | Stroke | - |
| dc.subject | Trial design | - |
| dc.title | Non-Inferiority Trials in Stroke Research: What Are They, and How Should We Interpret Them? | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5853/jos.2024.03923 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85218131592 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 41 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 51 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 2287-6391 | - |
