File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Geochemistry characteristics and tectonic significance of the ‘ “mafic” S-type granites’

TitleGeochemistry characteristics and tectonic significance of the ‘ “mafic” S-type granites’
Authors
KeywordsGeochemistry
petrogenesis models
tectonic background
‘ “mafic’ S-type granites’
Issue Date11-Apr-2025
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
International Geology Review, 2025, v. 67, n. 15, p. 1855-1878 How to Cite?
Abstract

Taking account of their importance in inferring continental geodynamic processes, S-type granites have been the subject of considerable research since their discovery and identification. With their high A/CNK (Mol. Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O + CaO) > 1.1) and low Na2O (<3.2 wt.%) and MgO + FeOT contents (generally with maficity < 4 wt.%), S-type granites were originally considered to be largely derived from partial melting of metasedimentary sources in orogeny zone settings. However, it is hotly debated why many S-type granites show significantly higher maficity [here defined as the weight percent of MgO + FeOT up to 12 wt.% and lower silica (SiO2 <65 wt.%), known as low- to medium-silica ‘mafic’ S-type granites (L-MSMST granites). Hence, the interpretation of these distinctive S-type granites has provided valuable insights into anatectic and metamorphic processes, tectonic thermal events, and the evolutionary dynamics of the crust along convergent margins. Nevertheless, with the increasing number of reported ‘special S-type granites ’,the absence of standardized terminology has become increasingly evident. In light of this, the present study critically examines advancements in defining maficity S-type granites and formally introduces widely accepted classifications and genetic models associated with them. A comprehensive compilation of published articles on maficity S-type granites was utilized to construct a robust database. This database facilitated the screening of 404 samples, applying various geochemical definitions to refine the selection process. We recognize that (1) the L-MSMST granites are inconsistent with originally defined S-type granite (ST granite); (2) the schematic models of the addition of mantle derived materials can explain the formation of high silica ‘non-mafic’ S-type granites (HSNMST granites) and L-MSMST granites; and (3) L-MSMST granites were may be formed in a typical extensional tectonic background.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362647
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.927

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShi, Qiang-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiang Zhi-
dc.contributor.authorShu, Run Xiao-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yu Song-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shi Jie-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Zhong Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Kai Yun-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Guo Chun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-26T00:36:42Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-26T00:36:42Z-
dc.date.issued2025-04-11-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Geology Review, 2025, v. 67, n. 15, p. 1855-1878-
dc.identifier.issn0020-6814-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/362647-
dc.description.abstract<p>Taking account of their importance in inferring continental geodynamic processes, S-type granites have been the subject of considerable research since their discovery and identification. With their high A/CNK (Mol. Al2O3/(Na2O + K2O + CaO) > 1.1) and low Na2O (<3.2 wt.%) and MgO + FeO<sup>T</sup> contents (generally with maficity < 4 wt.%), S-type granites were originally considered to be largely derived from partial melting of metasedimentary sources in orogeny zone settings. However, it is hotly debated why many S-type granites show significantly higher maficity [here defined as the weight percent of MgO + FeO<sup>T</sup> up to 12 wt.% and lower silica (SiO2 <65 wt.%), known as low- to medium-silica ‘mafic’ S-type granites (L-MSMST granites). Hence, the interpretation of these distinctive S-type granites has provided valuable insights into anatectic and metamorphic processes, tectonic thermal events, and the evolutionary dynamics of the crust along convergent margins. Nevertheless, with the increasing number of reported ‘special S-type granites ’,the absence of standardized terminology has become increasingly evident. In light of this, the present study critically examines advancements in defining maficity S-type granites and formally introduces widely accepted classifications and genetic models associated with them. A comprehensive compilation of published articles on maficity S-type granites was utilized to construct a robust database. This database facilitated the screening of 404 samples, applying various geochemical definitions to refine the selection process. We recognize that (1) the L-MSMST granites are inconsistent with originally defined S-type granite (ST granite); (2) the schematic models of the addition of mantle derived materials can explain the formation of high silica ‘non-mafic’ S-type granites (HSNMST granites) and L-MSMST granites; and (3) L-MSMST granites were may be formed in a typical extensional tectonic background.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Geology Review-
dc.subjectGeochemistry-
dc.subjectpetrogenesis models-
dc.subjecttectonic background-
dc.subject‘ “mafic’ S-type granites’-
dc.titleGeochemistry characteristics and tectonic significance of the ‘ “mafic” S-type granites’-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00206814.2025.2488004-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105002715260-
dc.identifier.volume67-
dc.identifier.issue15-
dc.identifier.spage1855-
dc.identifier.epage1878-
dc.identifier.eissn1938-2839-
dc.identifier.issnl0020-6814-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats